Award Emoji
This it first iteration of award emoji feature.
We have plan to extend emoji picker by the next release.
For now, you can add award by clicking to the emoji picker or posting a regular comment with emoji like "👍" and any other. You can post not only emoji that listed in the emoji picker.
See merge request !1825
write_ was renamed to create_
modify_ was renamed to update_
So now in update action we have next code
def create
can?(current_user, :create_issue, @issue)
end
def update
can?(current_user, :update_issue, @issue)
end
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
**What does this do?**
It makes sure that whenever a new note is added to an noteable item, the
updated_at of that item is also updated.
**Why is this needed?**
At this moment when you post a comment on an issue or add a label to an issue,
the updated_at is not changed. Because of this the filtering for least recently
updated is not really useful (since it only takes in account the original text
from the noteable).
Signed-off-by: Jeroen van Baarsen <jeroenvanbaarsen@gmail.com>
It should not set noteable_id if noteable_type is Commit
We have Note#commit_id for this
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
Any mention of Issues, MergeRequests, or Commits via GitLab-flavored markdown
references in descriptions, titles, or attached Notes creates a back-reference
Note that links to the original referencer. Furthermore, pushing commits with
commit messages that match a (configurable) regexp to a project's default
branch will close any issues mentioned by GFM in the matched closing phrase.
If accepting a merge request would close any Issues in this way, a banner is
appended to the merge request's main panel to indicate this.
The good:
- You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work).
- Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects
- Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests
- Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate
The questionable:
- Events only know about target projects
- Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target
- All operations performed in the satellite
The bad:
- Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between)
(for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos)
Fixes:
Make test repos/satellites only create when needed
-Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap)
-project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually
-fixed remote removal
-How to merge renders properly
-Update emails to show project/branches
-Edit MR doesn't set target branch
-Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test
-Added back a test around merge request observer
-Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers
-Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well
-Signifant speed ups for tests
-Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests
-Remove wiki schema update
Fixes for search/search results
-Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects
-updated search results to reference the correct (target) project
-udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request
Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
Dmitriy ZaporozhetsandRobert Speicher
Douwe Maan
Stan Hu
Valery Sizov
Jeroen van Baarsen
Marin Jankovski
Vinnie Okada
Drew Blessing
vagrant
ash wilson
Izaak AlpertandIzaak Alpert
Riyad Preukschas
Vincent Bonmalais
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Nihad Abbasov