Ths commit does next:
* When we remove project we move repository to path+deleted.git
* Then we schedule removal of path+deleted with sidekiq
* If repository move failed we abort project removal
This should help us with NFS issue when project get removed but
repository stayed. The full explanation of problem is below:
* rm -rf project.git
* rm -rf removes project.git/objects/foo
* NFS server renames foo to foo.nfsXXXX because some NFS client (think
* Unicorn) still has the file open
* rm -rf exits, but project.git/objects/foo.nfsXXX still exists
* Unicorn closes the file, the NFS client closes the file (foo), and the
* NFS server removes foo.nfsXXX
* the directory project.git/objects/ still exists => problem
So now we move repository and even if repository removal failed
Repository directory is moved so no bugs with project removed but
repository directory taken. User still able to create new project with
same name. From administrator perspective you can easily find stalled
repositories by searching `*+deleted.git`
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
Restricted visibility levels - bug fix and new feature
This allows admin users to override restricted visibility settings when creating and updating projects and snippets, and moves the restricted visibility configuration from gitlab.yml to the web UI. See #1903.
## Move configuration location
I added a new section to the application settings page for restricted visibility levels. Each level has a checkbox, styled with Bootstrap to look like a toggle button. A checked box means that the level is restricted. I added a glowing text shadow and changed the background color for checked buttons because the default styles made it hard to distinguish between checked and unchecked. This image shows the new section with the "Public" box checked:
## Allow admins to override
To allow admin users to override the restricted visibility levels, I had to remove the `visibility_level` validation from the `Project` class. The model doesn't know about the `current_user`, which should determine whether the restrictions can be overridden. We could use the creator in the validation, but that wouldn't work correctly for projects where a non-admin user is the creator and an admin tries to change the project to a restricted visibility level.
The `Project::UpdateService` and `Project::CreateService` classes already had code to determine whether the current user is allowed to use a given visibility level; now all visibility level validation is done in those classes. Currently, when a non-admin tries to create or update a project using a restricted level, these classes silently set the visibility level to the global default (create) or the project's existing value (update). I changed this behavior to be more like an Active Model validation, where using a restricted level causes the entire request to be rejected.
Project and personal snippets didn't have service classes, and restricted visibility levels weren't being enforced in the model or the controllers. The UI disabled radio buttons for restricted levels, but that wouldn't be difficult to circumvent. I created the `CreateSnippetService` and `UpdateSnippetService` classes to do the same restricted visibility check that the project classes do. And since I was dealing with snippet visibility levels, I updated the API endpoints for project snippets to allow users to set and update the visibility level.
## TODO
* [x] Add more tests for restricted visibility functionality
cc @sytse @dzaporozhets
See merge request !1655
Add new service classes to create and update project and personal
snippets. These classes are responsible for enforcing restricted
visibility settings for non-admin users.
Include number of affected people in all/group mention autocomplete item.
As mentioned in #2054.
To minimize misuse of all/group mentions, the autocomplete title includes the number of members this mention will notify, so users will be more considerate what groups they mention.
Example:
at-all "**all** All Project and Group Members (12)"
at-gitlab "**gitlab** GitLab (12)"
See merge request !1596
Valery SizovandKamil Trzcinski
Stan Hu
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Jared Szechy
Douwe Maan
Robert Speicher
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Vinnie Okada
Hannes RosenöggerandDouwe Maan
Steven ThonusandHannes Rosenögger
