Updated blank state for environments and deployments
## What does this MR do?
Adds a designed blank state to environments and deployments.
@markpundsack do we want to hide the new environments when empty? Looks weird otherwise with the green button at the top.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18661
## Screenshots (if relevant)


See merge request !4818
A lot of git operations were being repeated, for example, to build a url
you would ask if the path was a Tree, which would call a recursive routine
in Gitlab::Git::Tree#where, then ask if the path was a Blob, which would
call a recursive routine at Gitlab::Git::Blob#find, making reference to
the same git objects several times. Now we call Rugged::Tree#path, which
allows us to determine the type of the path in one pass.
Some other minor improvement added, like saving commonly used references
instead of calculating them each time.
Show proper image ID on registry page
## What does this MR do?
Display the container registry image ID (from the config blob) instead of the first image layer ID
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
To show proper image ID on container_registry page.
This only supports manifest V2, since the manifest V1 doesn't expose information about Image ID.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18159.
## Screenshots (if relevant)

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4821
Allow to fetch LFS from CI
## What does this MR do?
This adds support for fetching LFS object from CI jobs (mostly it's made for supporting GitLab CI).
## What is left?
- [x] Write tests covering a new authorization mechanism
cc @grzesiek @marin
See merge request !4465
GitLab CI Yaml template dropdown
## What does this MR do?
Make it possible to select a dropdown for an easy start with GitLab CI.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#17521
## TODO
- [ ] Backend
- [x] CHANGELOG item
- [x] Fix rubocop failure
- [x] API Support
- [x] New tests
- [x] Add disclaimer to the top of the gitlab-ci.yml
- [ ] Frontend
- [x] New tests
See merge request !4411
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project.

----

----

Closes#3407
See merge request !4093
This commit builds on the groundwork in
ee008e300b1ec0abcc90e6a30816ec0754cea0dd, which refactored the backend
so the same code could be used for new dropdowns. In this commit its
used for templates for the `.gitlab-ci.yml` files.
Refs dropdown is now loaded async
## What does this MR do?
The refs dropdown is loaded async so not to block the page.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Part of #18202
## Screenshots (if relevant)

See merge request !4508
Fallback to group's owners/masters when a project has none for the "access requested email"
## What does this MR do?
From b31c5052f9:
Fallback to group's owners/masters when a project has none
A project in a group can have no explicit owners/masters,
in that case we fallbacks to the group's owners/masters.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because of #18757.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18757.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] No need for CHANGELOG.
- [x] No need for documentation.
- [x] No API support added.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4791
POC: Markdown shortcut buttons
## What does this MR do?
Adds markdown shortcut buttons to text area for comments.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Because changing `textarea.val('something')` kills the natural browser undo stack, I had to implement a custom undo stack using state. You can't use the "undoable" state undo pattern because you need to go back to a previous state regardless of cursor position. The undo also adds an undo history item once you delete stuff or press enter.
You can also edit multiple textareas at once and it will keep an undo history for each textarea individually, so the undo state should not collide between textareas.
## Why was this MR needed?
It has been requested multiple times and the competition has it. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17185#note_12073433
Libraries are available that already implement this functionality but they are enormous and bloaty. I implemented this in very few lines of code and kept it very simple and as minimal as possible. This was also some competitions approach. I believe so as to not include too much JS.
Adding extra buttons with new functionality **should only need new HTML and no new JS**.
Only extra complex thing was adding a overridden undo stack, which was made as simple as possible as well.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17185#note_12073433
## Screenshots (if relevant)
**NOTE:** One thing you cannot see in this screenshot is that I am pressing <kbd>Cmd</kbd><kbd>Z</kbd> to undo and <kbd>Cmd</kbd><kbd>Shift</kbd><kbd>Z</kbd> to redo which is the undo/redo stack I implemented. <kbd>Ctrl</kbd><kbd>Y</kbd> also works for redo.

cc @dzaporozhets for UI
cc @iamphill @alfredo1 for JS review
cc @JobV if you like the idea.
Fixes: #17185
See merge request !4305
* upstream/master: (353 commits)
Put some admin settings in dropdown
Add styleguide on configuration settings documentation
Remove Duplicated keys add UNIQUE index to fingerprint
Avoid autoload issue such as 'Mail::Parsers::AddressStruct'
Move appearance settings as sub tab to application settings
use rails root join
fixed a couple of errors spotted in production
Fix RangeError exceptions when referring to issues or merge requests outside of max database values
Fix bug in `WikiLinkFilter`.
Grammar and typographic changes to artifacts documentation
Tweak grammar
Small frontend code fixes and restore 8a2d88f commit
Warn about admin privilege to disable GitHub Webhooks
Listing GH Webhooks doesn't stop import process for non GH admin users
fixup! updated docs for api endpoint award emoji
Update CHANGELOG
Ensure Todos counters doesn't count Todos for projects pending delete
Add endpoints for award emoji on notes
Sort API endpoints and implement feedback
Add endpoints for Award Emoji
...
A project in a group can have no explicit owners/masters,
in that case we fallbacks to the group's owners/masters.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Fix RangeError exceptions when referring to issues or merge requests outside of max database values
When using #XYZ in Markdown text, if XYZ exceeds the maximum value of a signed 32-bit integer, we get an exception when the Markdown render attempts to run `where(iids: XYZ)`. Introduce a method that will throw out out-of-bounds values.
Closes#18777
See merge request !4777
When using #XYZ in Markdown text, if XYZ exceeds the maximum value of a signed 32-bit integer, we
get an exception when the Markdown render attempts to run `where(iids: XYZ)`. Introduce a method
that will throw out out-of-bounds values.
Closes#18777
1. An exception would be raised if the filter was called with an invalid
URI. Mainly because we weren't catching the `Addressable` exception.
2. This commit fixes it and adds a spec for the filter.
Implement custom notification level options


part of #12758
See merge request !4389
Ensure that group owner cannot request access to a project of their group
## What does this MR do?
It fixes two things:
- 91ad995d69e1a0f8991fd896f1d9febc109273fe Ensure that group owner cannot request access to a project of their group
- ec3ff061148d556757e7cd486cdc6083d77acf34 Ensure group/project owners can see their members' access_level (see the commit message for details)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Not really, these are pretty simple fixes.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because there was an issue created!
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18717.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] CHANGELOG is not needed since the bug is only present in a 8.9 RC
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4729
Ensure Todos counters doesn't count Todos for projects pending delete
Use `TodosFinder` instead of `current_user.todos` to filter projects
pending delete on Todos counters helpers.
Counters should not reflect the number of Todos displayed on the tabs.
Fixes#18633
See merge request !4663
Disable the unlink feature for SAML connected accounts (social login).
This disables the ability to manually unlink your SAML account, if you have one connected. In certain scenarios, the only allowed login mechanism can be SAML, and if you unlink your account you will be locked out of the system (configuration dependent).
Fixes#18613
See merge request !4662
Do not check repos without push events
Reduce false positives from automatic repository checks by skipping
projects without push events.
See merge request !4684
Track method call times/counts as a single metric
This changes method call tracking so only a single metric is emitted regardless of the number of calls. This allows us to more accurately measure the total execution time of a method as well as the number of times a method is called. See 851e3ff7578973c2206628424eac3b951a3c656d for more details.
Method call tracking tracked calls individually meaning the end statistics may not always be accurate enough to get a good understanding of where time is spent.
See merge request !4754