Use dedicated methods for counting branches and tags
This started out as "Lets add two methods to count and cache some data" and ended up in a clean-up/fix of some existing code. The two problems were:
1. Different code was used for adding/removing branches/tags via Git and the UI
2. The code used for the UI didn't have any RSpec tests, and I couldn't find any Spinach tests either (though grepping for Spinach stuff is hard)
This MR addresses the following:
1. `Repository#branch_count` and `Repository#tag_count` are used to count and cache the number of branches/tags, these methods are then used on the branches/commits/tags pages.
2. `Repository#add_tag`, `Repository#add_branch`, `Repository#rm_tag` and `Repository#rm_branch` now all the appropriate before/after hook methods instead of calling a random single cache expiration method. This ensures caches are properly flushed when adding/removing tags/branches via the UI.
3. RSpec tests were added for the above methods.
This fixes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#13459
See merge request !3128
The methods used for this are Repository#tag_count and
Repository#branch_count which cache their output in Redis as well as
memoizing it in an instance variable. Both methods have a corresponding
methods/hooks to flush the caches at the right time.
This allows to reuse one job as a template for another one:
```
job1: &JOBTMPL
script: execute-script-for-job
job2: *JOBTMPL
```
This also helps to solve some of the issues in #342
Signed-off-by: Pascal Bach <pascal.bach@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Huser <fabio.huser@siemens.com>
These three tests were essentially checking that adding a note to
something updated its `noteable`'s `updated_at` attribute.
This is well-tested Rails behavior and we shouldn't feel the need to
write an integration test to verify it. At most we should be ensuring
that the association definition adds the `touch: true` option, which we
now do in Note's unit test.
Add support for cross project references for labels
## Summary
Support for cross project references for labels.
## Rationale
1. Cross project label references are currently not supported in GitLab
1. `to_reference` method signature in `Label` model breaks the abstraction introduced in `Referable`.
`concerns/referable.rb: def to_reference(_from_project = nil)`
Signatures:
```
label.rb: def to_reference(format = :id)
commit_range.rb: def to_reference(from_project = nil)
commit.rb: def to_reference(from_project = nil)
external_issue.rb: def to_reference(_from_project = nil)
group.rb: def to_reference(_from_project = nil)
issue.rb: def to_reference(from_project = nil)
merge_request.rb: def to_reference(from_project = nil)
milestone.rb: def to_reference(from_project = nil)
project.rb: def to_reference(_from_project = nil)
snippet.rb: def to_reference(from_project = nil)
user.rb: def to_reference(_from_project = nil)
```
This MR suggests using `def to_reference(from_project = nil, format: :id)` which makes use of keyword arguments and preserves abstract interface.
1. We need support for cross project label references when we want to move issue to another project
It may happen that issue description, system notes or comments contain reference to label and this reference will be invalid after moving issue to another project and will not be displayed correctly unless we have support for cross project references.
Merge request that needs this feature: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/2831
I think that cross project label references may be useful, (example: `Hey, see our issues for CI in GitLab CE! - gitab-org/gitlab-ce~"CI"`).
cc @JobV @DouweM @rspeicher
See merge request !2966
Indicate when an MR diverged from the target branch
This adds an indicator to the "Merge MR" box, to tell if and how much an MR diverged from its target branch.
For instance, consider an MR to merge the branch `feature` into `master`. Some other commits were added to `master` since `feature` was created, and the two branches diverged.
```text
o master
|
o o feature
| |
o o
| /
o
```
In this case, there will be a label in the MR Merge box stating:
> This MR is by 3 commits behind the target branch `master`.
## Screenshots
### The branch diverged from the target (UI Proposal)
### The branch diverged from the target (alternative UI Proposal)
## How is this useful?
- In a _rebase-workflow_ (MR are preferably rebased before being merged), the reviewer wants to know if an MR is rebased on the target branch before merging it.
_With this indicator, the reviewer knows immediately if the branch is rebased, or if she needs to ask the committer to rebase its branch._
<br>
- To keep the git history readable, a team prefers to avoid merging branches that really lag a lot behind the target branch. Merging an MR that is 10 commits behind is fine, but 200 is too much.
_With this indicator, the reviewer can see on the MR page if the branch is really far behind the target – or only a few commits behind._
## Open questions
We've been using this at @captaintrain for a few months now, and found it quite useful.
I guess the open-questions are mostly: what UI would be the more adequate? Any thoughts on this, on the general usefulness and/or on the code?
See merge request !2217
Add a spec for WikiPipeline
Removes the specs from GollumTagsFilter that were more like integration
tests for the pipeline than unit tests of the filter.
See merge request !3054
Flush repository caches before renaming projects
This should hopefully solve gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#13790. Once I know the exact steps to reproduce the problem I should be able to confirm this.
cc @dblessing @inem
See merge request !2974
Reuse query from ProjectsFinder to get projects accessible to current user.
Fixes#13648
This is a refactor to reuse the existing query from our `ProjectsFinder` class
See merge request !3049
Kamil Trzcinski
Rémy Coutable
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Robert Speicher
Robert Speicher
Yorick Peterse
Pascal Bach
tiagonbotelhoandYorick Peterse
Iuri de SilvioandRémy Coutable
Douwe Maan
Rubén Dávila
evuezandRémy Coutable
Phil Hughes
Jacob Vosmaer
Pierre de La Morinerie
Grzegorz Bizon