Fix permission checks in member row (backport from gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!460)
## What does this MR do?
It improves the check we use to display or not the members' access and controls in the members list.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No, I replaced an helper with just a permission check so I think it's a better solution.
## Why was this MR needed?
There were a spec failure in gitlab-org/gitlab-ee!460 because of the refactor done in the "request access" MR.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- No CHANGELOG needed
- [x] Tests
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4670
Fixed issue with user calendar colors
## What does this MR do?
Fixes an issue with the colors added onto the user contrib calendar. The calendar was change recently to remove a library which affected how the colors where generated.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18505
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4614
Add sorting dropdown to tag page
## What does this MR do?
Adds a sorting dropdown to the tags page just like the one on the branches page.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No
## Why was this MR needed?
Clients were asking for this
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#14918
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4423
Fixed ordering in Project.find_with_namespace
This MR fixes the ordering of `Project.find_with_namespace` to ensure that it returns rows that match literally first.
Closes#18603
See merge request !4682
Remove JiraIssue model and replace references with ExternalIssue
This MR Removes unused JiraIssue class and replaces references with ExternalIssue
Closes#18203
See merge request !4659
Added title attribute to entries in tree view
## What does this MR do?
Adds a title attribute to entries in the tree view. Moe useful when files have long names.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18353
See merge request !4709
Fix project header alignment media query bug
## What does this MR do?
Fixes media query bug on project header
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4689
Hide the Todo button in the collapsed issuable sidebar.
## What does this MR do?
Fixes a bug where the "Add Todo" button was displayed in the collapsed sidebar.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
This shouldn't remove any other elements from the collapsed sidebar.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Before:
After:
See merge request !4686
Add bottom padding for merge request command line text
Because without bottom padding text is too close to the UI tabs - hard to navigate
See merge request !4681
Fixed alignment of download dropdown
## What does this MR do?
Correctly aligns the download dropdown on merge requests
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4646
Fixed last push event banner not being in container
## What does this MR do?
Adds the last push event content into a container with the correct class.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18567
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4644
Fair usage of Shared Runners
## What does this MR do?
Introduces a fair usage scheduler for shared runners.
It tries to assign builds to shared runner from projects that have the lowest number of builds currently running on shared runners.
**Example 1**:
```
We have following builds in queue:
build 1 for project 1
build 2 for project 1
build 3 for project 1
build 4 for project 2
build 5 for project 2
build 6 for project 3
With the new algorithm we will assign builds in following order:
- We choose build 1, because project 1 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We choose build 4, because project 2 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We choose build 6, because project 3 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We choose build 2, because project 1 as other it runs 1 build,
- We choose build 5, because project 2 runs 1 build, where project 1 runs 2 builds now,
- We choose build 3, because project 1 and runs 2 builds.
```
**Example 2**:
```
We have following builds in queue:
build 1 for project 1
build 2 for project 1
build 3 for project 1
build 4 for project 2
build 5 for project 2
build 6 for project 3
With the new algorithm we will assign builds in following order:
- We choose build 1, because project 1 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We finish build 1,
- We choose build 2, because project 1 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We choose build 4, because project 2 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We finish build 4,
- We choose build 5, because project 2 doesn't run currently any builds and has the lowest build number from projects that doesn't run builds,
- We choose build 6, because project 3 doesn't run currently any builds,
- We choose build 3, because project 1, 2 and 3 runs exactly one build now,
```
## Why was this MR needed?
Currently, we are scheduling builds using FIFO. This is catastrophic if there are projects that create a 100-300 jobs, this basically eats most of available shared runners.
## Performance
All this logic is implemented with the help of SQL queries, because this is the fastest way to process 1k-2k pending builds in queue.
It's not the fastest SQL query, because it sorts based on number of running_builds, and this forces to calculate a number of running builds for all dependent projects. However, since we have one/two shared runners that asks every few seconds for builds this should have minimal impact on DB performance.
```
explain analyze SELECT "ci_builds".* FROM "ci_builds" JOIN (SELECT "ci_builds"."gl_project_id", count(case when status = 'running' AND runner_id = (SELECT "ci_runners"."id" FROM "ci_runners" WHERE "ci_runners"."is_shared" = 't') then 1 end) as running_builds FROM "ci_builds" INNER JOIN "projects" ON "projects"."id" = "ci_builds"."gl_project_id" AND "projects"."pending_delete" = 'f' WHERE "ci_builds"."type" IN ('Ci::Build') AND "ci_builds"."status" IN ('running', 'pending') AND "projects"."builds_enabled" = 't' AND "projects"."shared_runners_enabled" = 't' GROUP BY "ci_builds"."gl_project_id") AS projects ON ci_builds.gl_project_id=projects.gl_project_id WHERE "ci_builds"."type" IN ('Ci::Build') AND "ci_builds"."status" = 'pending' AND "ci_builds"."runner_id" IS NULL ORDER BY projects.running_builds ASC, ci_builds.id ASC;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Sort (cost=64777.28..64777.29 rows=1 width=1010) (actual time=301.794..302.535 rows=1537 loops=1)
Sort Key: (count(CASE WHEN (((public.ci_builds.status)::text = 'running'::text) AND (public.ci_builds.runner_id = $0)) THEN 1 ELSE NULL::integer END)), public.ci
_builds.id
Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 1423kB
-> Nested Loop (cost=63279.78..64777.27 rows=1 width=1010) (actual time=66.384..298.724 rows=1537 loops=1)
-> HashAggregate (cost=63177.15..63177.30 rows=15 width=15) (actual time=65.641..65.851 rows=187 loops=1)
InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
-> Seq Scan on ci_runners (cost=0.00..26963.66 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=1.145..34.381 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: is_shared
Rows Removed by Filter: 6965
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..36186.34 rows=2715 width=15) (actual time=0.065..29.717 rows=1710 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using index_ci_builds_on_status on ci_builds (cost=0.00..8913.95 rows=3577 width=15) (actual time=0.051..12.012 rows=2583 loops
=1)
Index Cond: ((status)::text = ANY ('{running,pending}'::text[]))
Filter: ((type)::text = 'Ci::Build'::text)
Rows Removed by Filter: 1219
-> Index Scan using projects_pkey on projects (cost=0.00..7.61 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.003..0.004 rows=1 loops=2583)
Index Cond: (id = public.ci_builds.gl_project_id)
Filter: ((NOT pending_delete) AND builds_enabled AND shared_runners_enabled)
Rows Removed by Filter: 0
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on ci_builds (cost=102.63..106.64 rows=1 width=1002) (actual time=1.216..1.231 rows=8 loops=187)
Recheck Cond: ((gl_project_id = public.ci_builds.gl_project_id) AND ((status)::text = 'pending'::text))
Filter: ((runner_id IS NULL) AND ((type)::text = 'Ci::Build'::text))
-> BitmapAnd (cost=102.63..102.63 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=1.201..1.201 rows=0 loops=187)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_ci_builds_on_gl_project_id (cost=0.00..10.52 rows=241 width=0) (actual time=0.406..0.406 rows=1944 loops=187)
Index Cond: (gl_project_id = public.ci_builds.gl_project_id)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on index_ci_builds_on_status (cost=0.00..91.78 rows=3089 width=0) (actual time=0.652..0.652 rows=3362 loops=187)
Index Cond: ((status)::text = 'pending'::text)
Total runtime: 303.832 ms
```
## Specific runners
It doesn't affect the specific runners which still serve builds FIFO.
@stanhu @markpundsack @yorickpeterse What do you think?
See merge request !4634
Shows build scroll buttons after build is complete
## What does this MR do?
Shows the build scroll buttons whenever there is a build trace. Previously they were only shown when the build was active.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18515
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4621
Fixed issue when opening a highlighted line diff
## What does this MR do?
With the new project nav being fixed, the diff page is scrolling the highlighted under the nav meaning you cant see what is highlighted. This corrects that by added the height of the new project nav into the offset.
See merge request !4597
Added source branch text to dropdown toggle
## What does this MR do?
Previously, the dropdown toggle would default to "Select source branch", this changes that so that it defaults to the branch name and if that doesn't exist, it defaults to "Select source branch"
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4504
Lighten each logo path color instead of white
## What does this MR do?
Changes highlight/loading colors of tanuki from white to a lighter version of each path color
## Why was this MR needed?
Since the logo is no longer on the dark sidebar, the highlight color was getting lost against the light gray background
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18521
## Screenshots (if relevant)
cc @jschatz1 @lbennett @dzaporozhets
See merge request !4690
Improve pipeline status in case that pipeline has no jobs
## What does this MR do?
This MR resolves problem with pipeline status when there are no build in pipeline.
This can happen when builds were skipped - for example - by using `only`/`except` keyword in `.gitlab-ci.yml`.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#17977
See merge request !4403
Turn Group#owners into a has_many association
## What does this MR do?
This turns the regular method `Group#owners` into a `has_many` association.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
As far as I can tell there's no way to do this without using an intermediate association, but perhaps I'm missing something. The reason an intermediate association is needed is because the supplied Proc is applied to the _final_ association (the one returning users), this means that when using a single `has_many` you can't filter out any intermediate rows (e.g. group members).
## Why was this MR needed?
This code being a regular method would prevent eager loading of the owners of a Group, turning it into a `has_many` association resolves this problem. This was discovered in !4410.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- [ ] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4676
Pinned sidebar navigation option
## What does this MR do?
Gives the ability to pin the sidebar navigation. Pinning is only possible on screens with above `lg` which is `1200px` if not it reverts to being hidden by default.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18542
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Un-pinned
### Pinned
See merge request !4683
Improve usability for prioritized labels
## What does this MR do?
- Adds an icon next to prioritized label rows serving as a hint to the user that the labels can be sorted by dragging them.
- Adds description about prioritized labels.
- Restores empty message when removing all prioritized labels.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Closes#18575
See merge request !4652
Fix long commit message scroll issue.
Fixes horizontal scrollbar for long commit description.
## Before
## After
See merge request !4643
added hover state to top nav links
## What does this MR do?
Adds hover state to top nav links.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Ney.
## Why was this MR needed?
UX.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18301.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4521
Replace raphael-rails with raphael.js and split it from the rest of the JS
## What does this MR do?
Removes raphael.js and its related libraries from the default JS bundle.
It also removes raphael-rails because the gem is unmaintained and – for whatever reason – didn't want to cooperate with the way I was trying to require it.
This brings the default (compressed and minified) application.js from 354KB after the d3 MR (!4394) down to 324KB.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
That tests pass and that there aren't errors on any pages (especially the Network page).
## Why was this MR needed?
It's only used on the Network page and was using way too much bandwidth for just one page.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#14372#13165
Follow-up to !4394 and !4516.
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !4519
Show categorised search queries in the search autocomplete
Fixes#5885
It works in 3 categories, Dashboard, Groups and Project.
## Dashboard context
## Group context
## Project context
## Screencast
See merge request !4499
Due date can be removed from milestones
## What does this MR do?
Adds a button to milestone form to allow user to remove due date
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#15063
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4428
Fixed issue with bold in issuable sidebar
## What does this MR do?
~~The sidebar contained both normal font weight & bold font weight, so this standardises them to bold.~~
After looking at the designs, i've updated the font weights & colors throughout the sidebar to correctly match them
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4398
Add shortcut to copy file content hash link
## What does this MR do?
* Allows for multiple shortcut handlers to be initialised
* Adds `y` shortcut to file pages to copy permalink URL.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Ney.
## Why was this MR needed?
UX
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#14470.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4496
New issue shortcut doesnt work on some pages
## What does this MR do?
1. Slightly tidies dispatcher switch case by utilising 'fall through' cases.
2. Adds shortcuts to project pipelines, milestones, builds and forks pages
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I have a feeling that these may have been missed out of the case statements on purpose?
## Why was this MR needed?
Possible UX issue highlighted in #17929.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#17929.
Closes#12616. (dup)
Closes#18123. (dup)
Closes#13688. (dup)
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4393
Resolve "Change admin navigation to match new UI"
## What does this MR do?
Moves admin navigation to layout nav to match Project, Groups, and Profile navigation
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
## Why was this MR needed?
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18338
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4650
Prevent default disabled buttons and links.
## What does this MR do?
Prevents default action for disabled buttons and links. If the element has `.btn` and `.disabled` at the same time, its default action will be prevented.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Yes. Is there a better way to do that?
## Why was this MR needed?
Right now we can click disabled links and it cause some troubles like in #18079.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18079
## Screenshots (if relevant)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4658
Show number of processed MRs in milestone page
closes#14025
See merge request !4006
Fixed issue with MR buttons being in a group
## What does this MR do?
Fixes design issue with the buttons in the merge request widget
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4562
Check if the Users table has exactly one user limiting the whole set
## What does this MR do?
Limit the query set so about a full scan for all the rows on the users table (only scan to records)
#18225
See merge request !4492
Add support for Docker Registry manifest v1
## What does this MR do?
Adds support for Manifest V1 generated by older versions of Docker (before 1.10).
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18609
See merge request !4669
Update project star/unstar tooltip
## What does this MR do?
Fixes project toggle star button tooltip to show actual tooltip for its state.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No.
## Why was this MR needed?
- When you star a project tooltip wasn't changing.
- When you star a project and refresh the page, tooltip was still showing `Star Project`
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18143
## Screenshots (if relevant)
### Before
### After
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4672
