Add links to CI setup documentation from project settings and builds pages
For #14483
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
See merge request !3384
Fix sorting issues/mrs by votes on the groups page
Closes#14394
The `non_archived` scope applied here https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/app/controllers/concerns/issues_action.rb#L5 overrides the previous `ORDER BY` applied inside the IssuesFinder, with the default scope of the Project model, resulting in SQL errors.
```ruby
Issue.reorder(created_at: :desc).joins(:project).to_sql
=> "SELECT issues.*
FROM issues INNER JOIN projects ON projects.id = issues.project_id
ORDER BY issues.created_at DESC"
Issue.reorder(created_at: :desc).joins(:project).merge(Project.non_archived).to_sql
=> "SELECT issues.*
FROM issues INNER JOIN projects ON projects.id = issues.project_id
WHERE projects.archived = 'f'
ORDER BY projects.id DESC"
Issue.reorder(created_at: :desc).joins(:project).merge(Project.non_archived.only(:where)).to_sql
=> "SELECT issues.*
FROM issues INNER JOIN projects ON projects.id = issues.project_id
WHERE projects.archived = 'f'
ORDER BY issues.created_at DESC"
```
/cc @yorickpeterse
See merge request !3333
Soft delete issuables
Fixes#2489
What still needs to happen: research on the indexes, the gem suggests a [lot of changes](https://github.com/rubysherpas/paranoia#about-indexes) though this is probably a good idea to discuss and I'm unsure on the impact of an omnibus upgrade as I suspect creating about 10 new indexes has a large impact on the downtime.
TODO:
- [x] Also group owners can ***soft*** delete
- [x] Button should be hidden
See merge request !2982
Improve performance of viewing individual issues
This MR does two things:
1. `Issue#related_branches` no longer performs Git operations that aren't needed
2. The output of `Repository#exists?` is now cached and flushed properly
Combined these two changes should further cut down the amount of Git operations performed when viewing individual issues (and possibly other pages).
See merge request !3296
* master:
Fix bug where wrong commit ID was being used in a merge request diff to show old image
Remove CHANGELOG item that was added during merge resolution
Improve the "easy WIP & un-WIP from link" feature
Fix specs
\#to_branch_name now uses the iid as postfix
Add label description in tooltip to labels in issue index and sidebar
Easily (un)mark merge request as WIP using link
Use specialized system notes when MR is (un)marked as WIP
another attempt to fix oauth issue
attempting to fix omniauth problem
Conflicts:
app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js.coffee
This caches the output of Repository#exists? in Redis while making sure
it's flushed properly when creating new repositories, deleting them,
etc.
For the ProjectWiki tests to work I had to make ProjectWiki#create_repo!
public as testing private methods in RSpec is a bit of a pain.
Requesting the branch names of a repository works even when it's empty,
thus there's no need to explicitly check for an empty repository.
Removing this check cuts down the amount of Git operations which in turn
cuts down request timings a bit. The regular expression used to compare
branches was also moved out of the loop so it's created only once.
Easily (un)mark merge request as WIP using link
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3768 and https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3516
## Link to add `WIP` prefix (underline is visible because of hover)
## Link to remove `WIP` prefix
## System note after WIP is added
## Widget with link to remove WIP
## Flash after WIP is removed
## System note after WIP is removed
## Widget when current user cannot remove the WIP prefix
cc @creamzy
See merge request !3006
#to_branch_name now uses the iid as postfix
Given the branch name 'mep-mep' with an iid being 1,
the current way, master's way, would yield a branch name of
1-mep-mep. The problem for larger projects however would be that
a developer might forget what iid the issue was.
When this developer would try to tab complete it would:
- Or result in 20+ branches possibly
- Or start with the wrong digit, try again with digit++
- Would see 20 branches, repeat
Thus the obvious way of solving this is letting the dev tab complete
on the issue title, which is easier to remember.
@DouweM Should this be labelled `pick-in-master`?
See merge request !3308
* master: (121 commits)
Dedupe labels in labels selector in Dashboard pages
Refactor colors and lists
Add a safeguard in MergeRequest#compute_diverged_commits_count
Fix an issue when the target branch of a MR had been deleted
Add avatar to issue and MR pages header
Cleanup somce css colors
Re-group scss variables
Refactor `Todo#target`
Fixes issue with filter label missing on labels & milestones
Rename `Todo#to_reference` to `Todo#target_reference`
Fixed failing tests
Updated controller with before_action Fixed other issues based on feedback
Fixes issue on dashboard issues
Full labels data in JSON
Fixed issue with labels dropdown getting wrong labels
Update CHANGELOG
Use `Note#for_project_snippet?` to skip notes on project snippet
Use `Commit#short_id` instead of `Commit.truncate_sha`
Reuse `for_commit?` on conditional validations
Update schema info comment on todo related files
...
Conflicts:
app/models/issue.rb
db/schema.rb
spec/models/issue_spec.rb
Given the branch name 'mep-mep' with an iid being 1,
the current way, master's way, would yield a branch name of
1-mep-mep. The problem for larger projects however would be that
a developer might forget what iid the issue was.
When this developer would try to tab complete it would:
- Or result in 20+ branches possibly
- Or start with the wrong digit, try again with digit++
- Would see 20 branches, repeat
Thus the obvious way of solving this is letting the dev tab complete
on the issue title, which is easier to remember.
Stan Hu
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Elias Werberich
Douglas Barbosa Alexandre
Robert Speicher
Douwe Maan
Lin Jen-Shin
Grzegorz Bizon
Rubén Dávila
Douwe Maan
Zeger-Jan van de Weg
James Lopez
Yorick Peterse
Jacob Schatz
Felipe Artur
Rémy Coutable