Restricted visibility levels - bug fix and new feature
This allows admin users to override restricted visibility settings when creating and updating projects and snippets, and moves the restricted visibility configuration from gitlab.yml to the web UI. See #1903.
## Move configuration location
I added a new section to the application settings page for restricted visibility levels. Each level has a checkbox, styled with Bootstrap to look like a toggle button. A checked box means that the level is restricted. I added a glowing text shadow and changed the background color for checked buttons because the default styles made it hard to distinguish between checked and unchecked. This image shows the new section with the "Public" box checked:

## Allow admins to override
To allow admin users to override the restricted visibility levels, I had to remove the `visibility_level` validation from the `Project` class. The model doesn't know about the `current_user`, which should determine whether the restrictions can be overridden. We could use the creator in the validation, but that wouldn't work correctly for projects where a non-admin user is the creator and an admin tries to change the project to a restricted visibility level.
The `Project::UpdateService` and `Project::CreateService` classes already had code to determine whether the current user is allowed to use a given visibility level; now all visibility level validation is done in those classes. Currently, when a non-admin tries to create or update a project using a restricted level, these classes silently set the visibility level to the global default (create) or the project's existing value (update). I changed this behavior to be more like an Active Model validation, where using a restricted level causes the entire request to be rejected.
Project and personal snippets didn't have service classes, and restricted visibility levels weren't being enforced in the model or the controllers. The UI disabled radio buttons for restricted levels, but that wouldn't be difficult to circumvent. I created the `CreateSnippetService` and `UpdateSnippetService` classes to do the same restricted visibility check that the project classes do. And since I was dealing with snippet visibility levels, I updated the API endpoints for project snippets to allow users to set and update the visibility level.
## TODO
* [x] Add more tests for restricted visibility functionality
cc @sytse @dzaporozhets
See merge request !1655
Fix email images
## Dependencies:
This MR Depends on gitlab-org/html-pipeline-gitlab!4 being **merged and published** to rubygems.org
## What does this MR do?
This MR fixes the broken images in emails that occured scince we introduced access control for all attachments in 7.8.
The access control lead to broken images, because the user usually isn't logged into gitlab when opening the email in his mail client.
The solution to fix this, is to replace all images that were uploaded to gitlab as attachemnts with inline images in emails.
I only added one test for images in notes, because all notes share the same view. If it works fine for a note on a commit, then it'll also work the same for notes on a MR or on issues.
@DouweM can you review this please?
Closes#1161
See merge request !373
Fix missing GitHub organisation repositories on import page.
Private repositories belonging to organizations rather than users can't be imported because `client.repos(org.login)` was requesting `/users/:org_login/repos` (which only returns public org repo's), while we need `/orgs/:org_login/repos` (which includes both public and private). The `client.org_repos` method does this.
cc @marin This is a bug in 7.8.x, but I'm not sure if it needs a minor release now or if it can go in 7.9.
See merge request !1683
This adds the functionality of replacing all images that were uploaded
to gitlab with inline images(base64) in emails.
This change fixes the broken images in emails that 7.8 introduced
Fix code preview theme setting for comments, issues, merge requests, and snippets
User color scheme was not being used: default white color scheme was always chosen. Also, default background for code in notes was always overriding the user color scheme.
Closes#1139
See merge request !357
Reject access to group/project avatar if the user doesn't have access.
Closes#2050.
I'll add tests for EE logos once this is merged here and merged into EE.
See merge request !1671
Also preserve code preview color scheme in events dashboard.
Assign default colors to all code blocks shown as <pre class="code highlight [color_scheme]">
Closes#1139
This fixes one of the problems mentioned in gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#1162 and makes the behavior of the commit calendar as described in the profile.
"All email addresses will be used to identify your commits."
This commit disables process_commit_messages()
for the initial push to the default branch.
This fixes the mass SQL statements (~500000) that were executed during
the initial push of the linux kernel for example.
Add new service classes to create and update project and personal
snippets. These classes are responsible for enforcing restricted
visibility settings for non-admin users.
Automatically link commit ranges to compare page.
Closes#2103
Implemented as proposed in the last paragraph of the issue:
> We could do something similar to Ruby, where `1..5` means `1,2,3,4,5` and `1...5` means `1,2,3,4`: `..` means inclusive, `...` means exclusive. In our case, `sha1...sha4` would mean `sha2,sha3,sha4` (exclusive with regards to `sha1`) and `sha1..sha4` would mean `sha1^...sha4`, i.e. `sha1,sha2,sha3,sha4` (inclusive to `sha1`).
- `sha1...sha4` now links to `compare/sha1...sha4`
- `sha1..sha4` now links to `compare/sha1^...sha4`.
See merge request !1649
Supports four different event types all bundled under the "note" event type:
- comments on a commit
- comments on an issue
- comments on a merge request
- comments on a code snippet
Fix namespace in merge request url building
Changes in 42387b733b now require namespace specification and broke abc69c8905.
There are additional helper functions in c530ca00b0, but this seemed easier not to rely on them.
See merge request !363