Extend commit calendar to actually show what commits were made on a date
## What does this MR do?
This MR extends the commit calendar so it acutally shows what commits were made on a date and in which project.
It is based on the optimizations @dzaporozhets made for the calendar.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The UI and how the links are generated i guess. That feels hacky at the moment :/
## Screenshot:
I assume that i have to refactor this a bit more to make it a cleaner implementation, so please give me feedback on what needs to be changed :)
See merge request !326
Add support for external wikis
## What does this MR do?
This MR adds the possibility to replace the link to the internal wiki of gitlab with a custom link.
Currently this is realised as a service.
## What Use Case does this MR solve?
In my Company we already have a wiki System (Confluence).
We have a policy to use the existing wiki, so we can't switch to the internal wiki Gitlab provides.
This currently only leaves us two choices:
1. Disable the gitlab wiki. That means we completly loose the connection between wiki and code from the gitlab ui.
2. Create a simple wiki page with a link to our external wiki and hope that no one uses the internal one.
Both solutions are not really good.
So what can be done to improve the situation while making it as easy as possible for new developers to access both, wiki and gitlab?
Replacing the wiki link kinda like the JIRA integration replaces the issues link looks like a good first step to me. :)
This can probably be extended later to completly prevent access to the internal wiki (currently that's still possible if you know the link) or maybe to check if the link really points to a wiki.
## Screenshot:
See merge request !291
Fix service UI
There was a small bug in the service UI that caused an empty 'Trigger' label to be shown. After this change the 'Trigger' field is not shown when only one event type of supported.
Before:
I think in the future there are other things we can do to enforce at least one selected event type and also show the user what the singular event type is if only one is supported. That will take time to work out and this is definitely acceptable for the time.
See merge request !395
Fix invalid Atom feeds when using emoji, horizontal rules, or images
This is a fix for issues #880, #723, #1113.
Markdown must be rendered to XHTML, not HTML, when generating summary content for Atom feeds. Otherwise, content-less tags like *img* and *hr* are not terminated and make the Atom XML invalid. Such tags are generated when issue descriptions, merge request descriptions, comments, or commit messages use emoji, horizontal rules, or images.
To pass this option through from the relevant Haml templates to the proper place in the `gfm()` method, a new method `gfm_with_options()` is introduced. It reuses the options dictionary passed to `markdown()` and interprets options `xhtml` and `parse_tasks` from it (the latter was a convenient replacement for `gfm_with_tasks()`). `xhtml` is already interpreted by Redcarpet::Render::HTML, but that alone was not sufficient, because the post-processing in `gfm()` would convert its XHTML tags back to HTML.
I found no way of passing additional optional options to the existing `gfm()` method without requiring updates to existing callers and without getting in the way of the existing optional arguments, but maybe someone who knows more about Ruby than I can think of one.
Thorough review appreciated since this is the first time I have used Ruby.
See merge request !344
Handle null restricted_visibility_levels setting
Fix a 500 error when the `restricted_visibility_levels` setting is null in the database - see #2134.
See merge request !1705
Fixes issues #880, #723, #1113: Markdown must be rendered to XHTML, not HTML, when generating summary content for Atom feeds. Otherwise, content-less tags like <img> and <hr>, generated when issue descriptions, merge request descriptions, comments, or commit messages use emoji, horizontal rules, or images, are not terminated and make the Atom XML invalid.
Check for nil values in the restricted_visibility_level validation
method, and set the restricted visibility request parameter to `[]` when
it's missing from the request.
Restricted visibility levels - bug fix and new feature
This allows admin users to override restricted visibility settings when creating and updating projects and snippets, and moves the restricted visibility configuration from gitlab.yml to the web UI. See #1903.
## Move configuration location
I added a new section to the application settings page for restricted visibility levels. Each level has a checkbox, styled with Bootstrap to look like a toggle button. A checked box means that the level is restricted. I added a glowing text shadow and changed the background color for checked buttons because the default styles made it hard to distinguish between checked and unchecked. This image shows the new section with the "Public" box checked:
## Allow admins to override
To allow admin users to override the restricted visibility levels, I had to remove the `visibility_level` validation from the `Project` class. The model doesn't know about the `current_user`, which should determine whether the restrictions can be overridden. We could use the creator in the validation, but that wouldn't work correctly for projects where a non-admin user is the creator and an admin tries to change the project to a restricted visibility level.
The `Project::UpdateService` and `Project::CreateService` classes already had code to determine whether the current user is allowed to use a given visibility level; now all visibility level validation is done in those classes. Currently, when a non-admin tries to create or update a project using a restricted level, these classes silently set the visibility level to the global default (create) or the project's existing value (update). I changed this behavior to be more like an Active Model validation, where using a restricted level causes the entire request to be rejected.
Project and personal snippets didn't have service classes, and restricted visibility levels weren't being enforced in the model or the controllers. The UI disabled radio buttons for restricted levels, but that wouldn't be difficult to circumvent. I created the `CreateSnippetService` and `UpdateSnippetService` classes to do the same restricted visibility check that the project classes do. And since I was dealing with snippet visibility levels, I updated the API endpoints for project snippets to allow users to set and update the visibility level.
## TODO
* [x] Add more tests for restricted visibility functionality
cc @sytse @dzaporozhets
See merge request !1655
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Marin Jankovski
Douwe Maan
Hannes Rosenögger
Valery Sizov
Drew Blessing
Christian Walther
Vinnie Okada
