Display last commit of deleted branch in push events
## What does this MR do?
Display the last commit of a deleted branch in the push events of a project.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Is the change in `app/models/event.rb` the correct way to display a two-line event for deleted branches?
## Why was this MR needed?
It is easier to restore an accidentally deleted branch if the commit hash is displayed in the push events.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18659
## Screenshots
### Before garbage collection

### After garbage collection

See merge request !4699
Fix encrypted data backwards compatibility after upgrading attr_encrypted gem
Adds missing attribute to attr_encrypted so it is fully backwards-compatible. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19073
See merge request !4963
Fix an information disclosure when requesting access to a group containing private projects
Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19102.
The commit speaks for itself:
Fix an information disclosure when requesting access to a group containing private projects
The issue was with the `User#groups` and `User#projects` associations
which goes through the `User#group_members` and `User#project_members`.
Initially I chose to use a secure approach by storing the requester's
user ID in `Member#created_by_id` instead of `Member#user_id` because I
was aware that there was a security risk since I didn't know the
codebase well enough.
Then during the review, we decided to change that and directly store the
requester's user ID into `Member#user_id` (for the sake of simplifying
the code I believe), meaning that every `group_members` / `project_members`
association would include the requesters by default...
My bad for not checking that all the `group_members` / `project_members`
associations and the ones that go through them (e.g. `Group#users` and
`Project#users`) were made safe with the `where(requested_at: nil)` /
`where(members: { requested_at: nil })` scopes.
Now they are all secure.
See merge request !1973
The issue was that `MergeRequest#mergeable?` returns false when the CI
state is not success and project.only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds is
true. In this case `Projects::MergeRequestsController#merge` would
return the `:failed` status when enabling `merge_when_build_succeeds`,
thus leading to a weird state and the MR never automatically merged.
The fix is to disable the CI state check in the controller safeguard
that early return the `:failed` status.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
The issue was with the `User#groups` and `User#projects` associations
which goes through the `User#group_members` and `User#project_members`.
Initially I chose to use a secure approach by storing the requester's
user ID in `Member#created_by_id` instead of `Member#user_id` because I
was aware that there was a security risk since I didn't know the
codebase well enough.
Then during the review, we decided to change that and directly store the
requester's user ID into `Member#user_id` (for the sake of simplifying
the code I believe), meaning that every `group_members` / `project_members`
association would include the requesters by default...
My bad for not checking that all the `group_members` / `project_members`
associations and the ones that go through them (e.g. `Group#users` and
`Project#users`) were made safe with the `where(requested_at: nil)` /
`where(members: { requested_at: nil })` scopes.
Now they are all secure.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
This commit changes the way certain documents are rendered (currently
only Notes) and how documents are redacted. Previously both rendering
and redacting would run on a per document basis. The result of this was
that for every document we'd have to run countless queries just to
figure out if we could display a set of links or not.
This commit changes things around so that redacting Markdown documents
is no longer tied into the html-pipeline Gem. This in turn allows it to
redact multiple documents in a single pass, thus reducing the number of
queries needed.
In turn rendering issue/merge request notes has been adjusted to take
advantage of this new setup. Instead of rendering Markdown somewhere
deep down in a view the Markdown is rendered and redacted in the
controller (taking the current user and all that into account). This has
been done in such a way that the "markdown()" helper method can still be
used on its own.
This particular commit also paves the way for caching rendered HTML on
object level. Right now there's an accessor method Note#note_html which
is used for setting/getting the rendered HTML. Once we cache HTML on row
level we can simply change this field to be a column and call a "save"
whenever needed and we're pretty much done.
This commit eager loads the award emoji on both the issues and the MRs.
When loading an issue with 108 comments this reduces the query count by
327 queries. On a merge request with the same amount of comments this
saves 148 queries. The large difference is not clear to me at this
point and the total query count is still huge with 387 and 1034
respectively. The biggest problem however, remains the calculation of
participants.
Fix pagination on sorts with lots of ties
## What does this MR do?
Fixes#18915. As we only order by the sorted column, we don't have any tie-breaker. Some orderings, like priority and weight, have lots of ties, so you can see duplicate results as you page through. (Timestamp columns are less susceptible to this.)
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I just picked `id DESC`, this could as easily be `id ASC`.
## Why was this MR needed?
Postgres and MySQL don't guarantee that pagination with `LIMIT` and
`OFFSET` will work as expected if the ordering isn't unique. From the Postgres docs:
> When using `LIMIT`, it is important to use an `ORDER BY` clause that
> constrains the result rows into a unique order. Otherwise you will get
> an unpredictable subset of the query's rows
Before:
[1] pry(main)> issues = 1.upto(Issue.count).map { |i| Issue.sort('priority').page(i).per(1).map(&:id) }.flatten
[2] pry(main)> issues.count
=> 81
[3] pry(main)> issues.uniq.count
=> 42
After:
[1] pry(main)> issues = 1.upto(Issue.count).map { |i| Issue.sort('priority').page(i).per(1).map(&:id) }.flatten
[2] pry(main)> issues.count
=> 81
[3] pry(main)> issues.uniq.count
=> 81
See merge request !4878
Postgres and MySQL don't guarantee that pagination with `LIMIT` and
`OFFSET` will work if the ordering isn't unique. From the Postgres docs:
> When using `LIMIT`, it is important to use an `ORDER BY` clause that
> constrains the result rows into a unique order. Otherwise you will get
> an unpredictable subset of the query's rows
Before:
[1] pry(main)> issues = 1.upto(Issue.count).map { |i| Issue.sort('priority').page(i).per(1).map(&:id) }.flatten
[2] pry(main)> issues.count
=> 81
[3] pry(main)> issues.uniq.count
=> 42
After:
[1] pry(main)> issues = 1.upto(Issue.count).map { |i| Issue.sort('priority').page(i).per(1).map(&:id) }.flatten
[2] pry(main)> issues.count
=> 81
[3] pry(main)> issues.uniq.count
=> 81
Resolve "Destroying a project causes post_decline_request to be executed"
## What does this MR do?
Ensure we don't send "access request declined" to access requesters when a project is deleted.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've created a service to decouple the notification sending from the AR model.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because there was an issue.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18755, #18750.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] No CHANGELOG needed.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4744
A lot of git operations were being repeated, for example, to build a url
you would ask if the path was a Tree, which would call a recursive routine
in Gitlab::Git::Tree#where, then ask if the path was a Blob, which would
call a recursive routine at Gitlab::Git::Blob#find, making reference to
the same git objects several times. Now we call Rugged::Tree#path, which
allows us to determine the type of the path in one pass.
Some other minor improvement added, like saving commonly used references
instead of calculating them each time.
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project.

----

----

Closes#3407
See merge request !4093
* upstream/master: (353 commits)
Put some admin settings in dropdown
Add styleguide on configuration settings documentation
Remove Duplicated keys add UNIQUE index to fingerprint
Avoid autoload issue such as 'Mail::Parsers::AddressStruct'
Move appearance settings as sub tab to application settings
use rails root join
fixed a couple of errors spotted in production
Fix RangeError exceptions when referring to issues or merge requests outside of max database values
Fix bug in `WikiLinkFilter`.
Grammar and typographic changes to artifacts documentation
Tweak grammar
Small frontend code fixes and restore 8a2d88f commit
Warn about admin privilege to disable GitHub Webhooks
Listing GH Webhooks doesn't stop import process for non GH admin users
fixup! updated docs for api endpoint award emoji
Update CHANGELOG
Ensure Todos counters doesn't count Todos for projects pending delete
Add endpoints for award emoji on notes
Sort API endpoints and implement feedback
Add endpoints for Award Emoji
...
When using #XYZ in Markdown text, if XYZ exceeds the maximum value of a signed 32-bit integer, we
get an exception when the Markdown render attempts to run `where(iids: XYZ)`. Introduce a method
that will throw out out-of-bounds values.
Closes#18777
This is to ensure we don't send unwanted notifications when deleting a
project. In other words, stop abusing AR callbacks and use services.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Implement custom notification level options


part of #12758
See merge request !4389