Resolve "Destroying a project causes post_decline_request to be executed"
## What does this MR do?
Ensure we don't send "access request declined" to access requesters when a project is deleted.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I've created a service to decouple the notification sending from the AR model.
## Why was this MR needed?
Because there was an issue.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Fixes#18755, #18750.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] No CHANGELOG needed.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4744
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project
Make it possible to lock runner on a specific project.
----
----
Closes#3407
See merge request !4093
Fix RangeError exceptions when referring to issues or merge requests outside of max database values
When using #XYZ in Markdown text, if XYZ exceeds the maximum value of a signed 32-bit integer, we get an exception when the Markdown render attempts to run `where(iids: XYZ)`. Introduce a method that will throw out out-of-bounds values.
Closes#18777
See merge request !4777
Implement custom notification level options
part of #12758
See merge request !4389
Make sure that artifacts_file is nullified after removing artifacts
## What does this MR do?
Fixes a problem that `ExpireBuildArtifactsWorker` is executed for all previously removed artifacts.
## Why was this MR needed?
Currently the `Ci::Build::erase_artifacts!` doesn't ensure that data are saved to database.
The bang at end of this method lets you believe that it should do so.
This adds a missing `save` to this method.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None, yet.
## CHANGELOG
Since this is regression in feature introduce in RC4 no CHANGELOG entry is needed.
cc @grzesiek
See merge request !4741
Allow creating Personal Access Tokens through the website
Related to #2979
- Allow a user to create personal access tokens, and use them to authenticate
- Refactor `API::Helpers` into `API::Helpers::Core` and `API::Helpers::Authentication`
# Tasks
- [ ] #2979 (!3749) - Personal Access Tokens
- [x] Basic Implementation
- [x] Add UI to add "Personal Access Tokens"
- [x] Reload `lib/api` on every request
- [x] Respect these tokens for API requests
- [x] Just a param or a header too?
- [x] Allow revoking tokens
- [x] Expire tokens
- [x] Left bar should have a "PAT" icon
- [x] Scopes?
- [x] Copy to Clipboard
- [x] Show active/inactive tokens separately
- [x] No need to check for expired/revoked in the appropriate places
- [x] Why does regular ApplicationController check for private token?
- [x] Support non-API requests
- [x] Revert (or work on) `lib/api` eager loading
- [x] Create MR
- [x] Refactoring
- [x] Fix tests
- [x] Write more tests
- [x] Add screenshots to MR
- [x] Add description of query performance to MR
- [x] Limit the number of queries in the `personal_access_tokens` page
- [x] Wait for CI to pass
- [x] Fix merge issues in schema.rb
- [x] Assign MR to endboss
- [x] Wait for feedback
- [x] Fix feedback
- [x] Wait for CI to pass
- [x] Assign to @rspeicher
- [x] Fix @rspeicher's comments
- [x] Wait for CI to pass
- [x] Assign back to @rspeicher
- [x] Write documentation and ping @axil
- [x] Wait for Axil to respond
- [x] Assign to endboss
- [x] Address Douwe's feedback
- [x] Use the `private_token` or `authentication_token` param instead of `personal_access_token`
- [x] Ditto for the header
- [x] Assign to endboss
- [x] Make sure CI is green
- [x] Address Douwe's feedback
- [x] Don't go through the `authenticate_user_from_private_token!` method, if a private token is supplied (or combine them)
- [x] In `authenticate_user_from_personal_access_token!` don't hit DB if `token_string` is `nil`
- [x] Use `current_user.personal_access_tokens.build` in the controller
- [x] Remove the "We aren't using `personal_access_token` as the root param" comment
- [x] `No need for = "...", we can just have the Inactive ... #{...} on the next line` in the view
- [x] Render dates in a (more) human format
- [x] CSS issue with table
- [x] Don't show the tokens in the UI indefinitely
- [x] How to implement scopes? Add-on to current impl? Doorkeeper?
- [x] Wait for @DouweM's comments about scopes
- [x] Address @DouweM's second review
- [x] Try not using `native['innerHTML']`
- [x] use contexts for all "when ..."
- [x] Ensure consistency (styling) with other pages for "You don't have any tokens" message
- [x] "Actions" table column doesn't need a label
- [x] %td can be moved outside of the if/else statement
- [x] The header title should be "Profile Settings"
- [x] Can this be a `before_create`, so we don't need to use `generate`?
- [x] If it couldn't be revoked, will we show an error?
- [x] If it couldn't be saved, will we show an error?
- [x] Merge master
- [x] Update CHANGELOG entry
- [x] Add tests for form errors?
- [x] Post screenshots
- [x] Tag @jschatz1 for review
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/0dff6fd/builds) to pass
- [x] Respond to @jschatz1's comments
- [x] Hardcoded colors should be variables
- [x] Should not be allowed to chose a date in the past
- [x] Use the same table as in the Applications tab
- [x] button should say "Create Personal Access Token"
- [x] Float the revoke to the right on the `a`
- [x] Change revocation message. "Are you sure you want to revoke this certificate? This action cannot be undone."
- [x] Date stays selected and looks selected even though date is set as "never".
- [x] ~~hover on the calendar button shifts~~ (not caused by this MR - happens on `milestones#new` as well)
- [x] Don't use the panel for the created token
- [x] Use a normal flash for "Your new personal access token has been created"
- [x] Show the input (with the token) below it full width.
- [x] Put the "Make sure you save it - you won't be able to access it again." message near the input
- [x] Have the input highlight all on single click
- [x] Update screenshots
- [x] Merge master in + conflicts
- [x] Assign to @jschatz1 again
- [x] Respond to @jschatz1's comments
- [x] No button for clipboard, only link
- [x] text-danger
- [x] highlight fade on that area where the token was created
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/d754d99179f1ffe846fcc1d8e858163b39efc5dc/builds) is green
- [x] Assign to @jschatz1
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/faa0e3f7580bc38d4d12916b4589c64d6c2678a7/builds) to pass
- [x] Respond to @DouweM's feedback
- [x] move the redirect_to out of the if/else
- [x] certificate -> token
- [x] datepicker back to text field
- [x] combine the get_user_from_private_token and get_user_from_personal_access_token methods in ApplicationController
- [x] combine the get_user_from_private_token and get_user_from_personal_access_token methods in `lib/api/helpers`
- [x] don't need the new constants
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/9d7cda3ddce52baad9618466a5d00319b333be57/builds) to pass
- [ ] Wait for merge
# Screenshots
See merge request !3749
Add sorting dropdown to tag page
## What does this MR do?
Adds a sorting dropdown to the tags page just like the one on the branches page.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No
## Why was this MR needed?
Clients were asking for this
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#14918
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4423
Fixed ordering in Project.find_with_namespace
This MR fixes the ordering of `Project.find_with_namespace` to ensure that it returns rows that match literally first.
Closes#18603
See merge request !4682
Remove JiraIssue model and replace references with ExternalIssue
This MR Removes unused JiraIssue class and replaces references with ExternalIssue
Closes#18203
See merge request !4659
Improve pipeline status in case that pipeline has no jobs
## What does this MR do?
This MR resolves problem with pipeline status when there are no build in pipeline.
This can happen when builds were skipped - for example - by using `only`/`except` keyword in `.gitlab-ci.yml`.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#17977
See merge request !4403
Turn Group#owners into a has_many association
## What does this MR do?
This turns the regular method `Group#owners` into a `has_many` association.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
As far as I can tell there's no way to do this without using an intermediate association, but perhaps I'm missing something. The reason an intermediate association is needed is because the supplied Proc is applied to the _final_ association (the one returning users), this means that when using a single `has_many` you can't filter out any intermediate rows (e.g. group members).
## Why was this MR needed?
This code being a regular method would prevent eager loading of the owners of a Group, turning it into a `has_many` association resolves this problem. This was discovered in !4410.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
None.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- [x] ~~API support added~~
- [ ] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4676
Add environments and deployments
This MR is a continuation of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17009.
The current implementation is as follow:
1. We have two new tables: `environments` and `deployments`.
2. We have a new tab: `Environments` under `Pipelines` where you can see all you environments and add a new one.
3. We add a new option to `.gitlab-ci.yml` to track where we should create a deployment for environment.
4. If environment in `.gitlab-ci.yml` is specified it will create a deployment. **If environment does not exist it will be created.** (this got changed)
5. The deployment is always successful and shows the time of the action, in that case a build that presumably should do deployment. In the future we could extend deployment with statuses: success, failure. We could extend deployments with information that this is partial or full deployment.
6. User have to create environments that he will track first.
7. User can remove environments.
8. User can retry/rollback past deployment (in that case we retry past build). The new build when succeeds it will create a new deployment.
9. Currently environment have only one parameter: `name`. In the future it should have: `variables`, `credentials` and possibly `runners` and maybe other resources.
10. Currently deployment have this parameters: `sha`, `ref`, `deployable (in this case a build)`, `user (who triggered a deployment)`, `created_at`.
The `.gitlab-ci.yml`:
```
deploy to production:
stage: deploy
script: dpl travis...
environment: production
```
What needs to be done:
- [x] Write initial implementation
- [x] Improve implementation (@ayufan)
- [x] Write tests (@ayufan)
- [x] Improve UX of the forms (cc @markpundsack) - reviewed by @markpundsack
- [x] Improve implementation of the views (cc @jschatz1) - done by @iamphill
- [x] Write .gitlab-ci.yml documentation for `environments` - done by @ayufan
- [ ] Write user documentation (@ayufan and @markpundsack)
See merge request !4605
Manually create todo for issuable
## What does this MR do?
Adds a button to the sidebar in issues & merge requests to allow users to manually create a todo item themselves.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#15045
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4502
+ Move 'Edit Project/Group' out of membership-related partial
+ Show the access request buttons only to logged-in users
+ Put the request access buttons out of in a more visible button
+ Improve the copy in the #remove_member_message helper
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Allow users to create confidential issues in private projects
Closes#14787
## What does this MR do?
Allow users to create confidential issues in private projects, and exclude access to them to project members with `Guest` role.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The query generated by the `User#authorized_projects` method.
## Why was this MR needed?
Community have been requesting this feature.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14787https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3678
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Not relevant.
## Todo
- [x] Allow users to create confidential issues in private projects
- [x] Project members with `Guest` role should not have access to confidential issues
- [ ] ~~Apply changes in EE + Elasticsearch~~ Will be done in another MR, when this got merged
See merge request !3471
Yorick PeterseandRobert Speicher
Robert SpeicherandRobert Speicher
Rémy CoutableandRobert Speicher
Douwe MaanandRémy Coutable
Douwe Maan
Kamil Trzcinski
Z.J. van de Weg
Paco Guzman
Stan Hu
David AlexanderandRémy Coutable