Replace raphael-rails with raphael.js and split it from the rest of the JS
## What does this MR do?
Removes raphael.js and its related libraries from the default JS bundle.
It also removes raphael-rails because the gem is unmaintained and – for whatever reason – didn't want to cooperate with the way I was trying to require it.
This brings the default (compressed and minified) application.js from 354KB after the d3 MR (!4394) down to 324KB.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
That tests pass and that there aren't errors on any pages (especially the Network page).
## Why was this MR needed?
It's only used on the Network page and was using way too much bandwidth for just one page.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#14372#13165
Follow-up to !4394 and !4516.
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !4519
Add environments and deployments
This MR is a continuation of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/17009.
The current implementation is as follow:
1. We have two new tables: `environments` and `deployments`.
2. We have a new tab: `Environments` under `Pipelines` where you can see all you environments and add a new one.
3. We add a new option to `.gitlab-ci.yml` to track where we should create a deployment for environment.
4. If environment in `.gitlab-ci.yml` is specified it will create a deployment. **If environment does not exist it will be created.** (this got changed)
5. The deployment is always successful and shows the time of the action, in that case a build that presumably should do deployment. In the future we could extend deployment with statuses: success, failure. We could extend deployments with information that this is partial or full deployment.
6. User have to create environments that he will track first.
7. User can remove environments.
8. User can retry/rollback past deployment (in that case we retry past build). The new build when succeeds it will create a new deployment.
9. Currently environment have only one parameter: `name`. In the future it should have: `variables`, `credentials` and possibly `runners` and maybe other resources.
10. Currently deployment have this parameters: `sha`, `ref`, `deployable (in this case a build)`, `user (who triggered a deployment)`, `created_at`.
The `.gitlab-ci.yml`:
```
deploy to production:
stage: deploy
script: dpl travis...
environment: production
```
What needs to be done:
- [x] Write initial implementation
- [x] Improve implementation (@ayufan)
- [x] Write tests (@ayufan)
- [x] Improve UX of the forms (cc @markpundsack) - reviewed by @markpundsack
- [x] Improve implementation of the views (cc @jschatz1) - done by @iamphill
- [x] Write .gitlab-ci.yml documentation for `environments` - done by @ayufan
- [ ] Write user documentation (@ayufan and @markpundsack)
See merge request !4605
Resolve "Track the number of new Redis connections per transaction"
## What does this MR do?
Add a new metric counter, `new_redis_connections`, that contains the number of calls to `Redis::Client#connect` in the current transaction.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Not sure. I tested this in kind of a brute-force way:
1. Add a debugger in the monkey-patched `connect` method.
2. With metrics enabled, start the app and load a page.
3. The first Redis connection is created by `Rack::Attack` and isn't in a transaction, but still works fine.
4. The second Redis connection is within a transaction (the page load), and increments the counter.
5. If I reload the page, neither debugger is hit.
6. If I use a Redis client and do `CLIENT KILL` on my two existing clients, then reload the page, I get 3 and 4 again.
7. If I disable metrics collection, the debugger never gets hit.
## Why was this MR needed?
We may have a Redis connection leak somewhere, so adding metrics will let us track this.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18451.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Hahaha nope, not relevant.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- [ ] Tests
- [ ] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
cc @yorickpeterse
See merge request !4649
Manually create todo for issuable
## What does this MR do?
Adds a button to the sidebar in issues & merge requests to allow users to manually create a todo item themselves.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#15045
## Screenshots (if relevant)
See merge request !4502
Allow users to request access to projects and groups
#### TODO:
- [x] Factorize the projects & groups members list
- [x] Factorize `request_access` and `approve` controller methods into a concern
- [x] Factorize the project & group dropdowns
- [x] Factorize access request routes
- [x] Factorize mailers
#### Will be done in separate MRs
- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] API
#### Access request to project
- [x] Design project access request button to spec (defined in #13948)
- [x] Request access to a project as a logged in user
- [x] Withdraw access request to a project as a logged in user
- [x] Do not treat project member request as actual membership (done partly in Ability)
- [x] Display access requests on project's members page (+ allow to change level, approve, and deny request)
- [x] Email requesting user at notification email address when accepted/denied
- [x] Email all project admins at notification email addresses when new access request
- [x] Unit specs to cover new functionality: `AccessRequestable` is missing specs
- [x] Controller specs to cover new functionality
- [x] Mailer specs to cover new functionality
- [x] Features specs to cover new UI and interactions
- [x] Regression specs still passing
#### Access request to group
- [x] Design group access request button to spec (defined in #13948)
- [x] Request access to a group as a logged in user
- [x] Withdraw access request to a group as a logged in user
- [x] Do not treat group member request as actual membership
- [x] Display access requests on group's members page (+ allow to change level, approve, and deny request)
- [x] Email requesting user at notification email address when accepted/denied
- [x] Email all project admins at notification email addresses when new access request
- [x] Unit specs to cover new functionality
- [x] Controller specs to cover new functionality
- [x] Mailer specs to cover new functionality
- [x] Features specs to cover new UI and interactions
- [x] Regression specs still passing
Closes#13948.
### Requesting access to a project
#### Responsive UI
#### Request access link
#### Flash once access is requested
#### Email sent to project admins on new access requests
##### HTML Email
##### Plain Email
### Withdrawing access request to a project
#### Withdraw access request link
#### Withdraw access request confirmation dialog box
#### Flash once access has been withdrawn
### Access requests management page
#### Deny access request confirmation dialog box
#### Email sent to requester on denied access requests
##### HTML Email
##### Plain Email
#### Email sent to requester on granted access requests
##### HTML Email
##### Plain Email
----------------------------------
----------------------------------
### Requesting access to a group
#### Responsive UI
#### Request access link
#### Flash once access is requested
#### Email sent to project admins on new access requests
##### HTML Email
##### Plain Email
### Withdrawing access request to a project
#### Withdraw access request link
#### Withdraw access request confirmation dialog box
#### Flash once access has been withdrawn
### Access requests management page
#### Deny access request confirmation dialog box
#### Email sent to requester on denied access requests
##### HTML Email
##### Plain Email
#### Email sent to requester on granted access requests
##### HTML Email
##### Plain Email
See merge request !3798
By default instrumentation will instrument public,
protected and private methods, because usually
heavy work is done on private method or at least
that’s what facts is showing
Improve Gitlab::Auth method names
Auth.find was a very generic name for a very specific method.
Auth.find_in_gitlab_or_ldap was inaccurate in GitLab EE where it also
looks in Kerberos.
See merge request !4589
Ensure only IDs ending in .git perform git actions
## What does this MR do?
Rails's routing is pretty strange. Previously, `GET /namespace/project/info/refs` would go to the Git HTTP controller (if the redirect for that case was taken out).
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
The specs fail if the redirect is moved to above the Git HTTP routes, removed altogether, or the Git HTTP constraints are changed. But there might still be missing cases.
## Why was this MR needed?
The master build and HTTP cloning were both broken.
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes#18376.
## Screenshots (if relevant)
Nope.
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?
- [x] [not needed] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [not needed] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] (not needed) API support added
- [ ] Tests
- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [ ] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)
See merge request !4558
It doesn't seem possible to set constraints based on format for project
IDs ending in .git, so set the constraint on the ID and ensure the
format is nil to avoid the case where the project ID is something like
project.git.foo.
Fix wiki linking behavior for markdown wiki pages
Related to #18019
- As per the documentation in !4372
## TODO
- [ ] !4432 Have wiki linking behave as per the documentation
- [x] Move `WikiLinkFilter` specs to the pipeline level
- [x] Verify current behavior on wiki `show` page
- [x] Fix current behavior on wiki `show` page
- [x] Verify current behaviour on wiki preview
- [x] Fix current behaviour on wiki preview
- [x] Rewrite all links and get preview links working
- [x] Make sure all links are on-par with the wiki `show` page
- [x] TDD `WikiLinkFilter` and get it working
- [x] Hook `WikiLinkFilter` up
- [x] Fix tests
- [x] Fix `markdown_spec`
- [x] Fix `wiki` spinach feature
- [x] Wait for [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/4f50dd2/builds) to pass
- [x] Make sure all wiki-related pages are working as expected (history, all pages, etc.)
- [x] Test in different ruby versions
- [x] GitLab instances hosted on a relative URL
- [x] Non-markdown rendering formats?
- [x] RDoc
- [x] ASCIIDoc
- [x] Create issues to fix things for RDoc and ASCIIDoc
- [x] Gauge performance impact
- [x] Refactor
- [x] Re-organize commits
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/f860e9a8dcabe7d5f160c32fc549807c98baa4a1/builds) passes
- [x] Respond to @rymai's comments
- [x] `class WikiLinkFilter < HTML::Pipeline::Filter`
- [x] blank line after guard clause
- [x] keyword arguments for `wiki` and `slug`
- [x] invert the condition
- [x] inline `user` in spec
- [x] Make sure spec names are not out of date
- [x] Comment for each rewrite rule
- [x] Add CHANGELOG entry
- [x] Reorganize commits
- [x] Make sure [build](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/19b91e749a6320d12fb299d33f1f6440777e0e26/builds) passes
- [ ] Wait for merge
See merge request !4432
- Need to pass in a `page_slug` to the filter, so it can rewrite based
on the current page (all links are rewritten to the level of the app root).
- The earlier `markdown_preview` endpoint was at the level of the wiki.
We need to know the current page (for rewriting, as above), so this
commit moves the endpoint to the level of a wiki page.
- Fix all tests
Sean McGivern
Jacob Schatz
Rémy Coutable
Douwe Maan
Stan Hu
Yorick Peterse
Douwe Maan
Kamil Trzcinski
Paco Guzman
David AlexanderandRémy Coutable
Phil Hughes
Connor Shea
Achilleas Pipinellis
Jacob Vosmaer
Timothy Andrew
Robert Speicher
Alejandro Rodríguez