Ability to move issue to another project
Tasks:
- [x] Create scaffold of service that will move issue to another project.
- [x] Close old issue, add system note about moving issue to a new project.
- [x] Create a new issue, add system note about issue being moved from old project.
- [x] Check if issue can be moved to another project before executing service
- [x] Check permissions when moving an issue (`:admin_issue` ability)
- [x] Display select box for a new project when editing an issue
- [x] Show only projects that issue can be moved into in that select box
- [x] Add project select handler, helper and some permission filters to it
- [x] Preserve as much information as possible, including author
- [x] Prepare mechanisms that unfolds local references in issue description
- [x] Rewrite issue description with references unfolding and add some specs for it
- [x] Rewrite all system notes and comments attached to issue that is being moved
- [x] Update `Label` so that is was able to create cross reference labels (separate MR)
- [x] Add notifications about moving issue to another project
- [x] Display confirmation alert/message when issue move has been requested
- [x] Make it possible to undo selecting project where issue will be moved to
- [x] Add column to issue, that will indicate if it has been moved to another project
- [x] Do not allow to move issue that has been already moved
- [x] Write top-to-bottom feature spec in RSpec instead of Spinach
UI:
Closes#3024
See merge request !2831
Disable reference generation in preformatted/code blocks
### Summary
If a user adds text in code or preformatted text via Markdown or HTML that contains `#XXX`, the system adds a note that issue `XXX` was mentioned. This is particularly annoying because we often list gdb backtrace dumps into our issues, and many issues get mentioned as a result. For example:
```
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000004004c4 in second () at main.cc:6
#1 0x00000000004004d2 in first () at main.cc:11
#2 0x00000000004004dd in main () at main.cc:17
(gdb)
```
### Steps to reproduce
1. In an issue, write the above text using Markdown or HTML tags (e.g. `<code>`, `<pre>`).
2. Observe that [issue 1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/1) and [issue 2](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/2) have a note that says they were mentioned.
### Expected behavior
Everything enclosed in the code blocks should be ignored as references.
### Observed behavior
Issues get referenced unnecessarily.
### Fix
I've made `reference_extractor.rb` strip out HTML and Markdown blocks before processing. I considered running the raw text through the entire Markdown processor, but this seems overkill and perhaps could lead to some unintended side effects.
See merge request !365
Store both the project and identifier of extracted references. This
prevents `ReferenceExtractor` from returning objects in the wrong
project for cross-project references.
Any mention of Issues, MergeRequests, or Commits via GitLab-flavored markdown
references in descriptions, titles, or attached Notes creates a back-reference
Note that links to the original referencer. Furthermore, pushing commits with
commit messages that match a (configurable) regexp to a project's default
branch will close any issues mentioned by GFM in the matched closing phrase.
If accepting a merge request would close any Issues in this way, a banner is
appended to the merge request's main panel to indicate this.
Kamil TrzcińskiandRémy Coutable
Douwe MaanandRémy Coutable
Drew Blessing
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Robert Speicher
Stan Hu
Jeroen van Baarsen
Marin Jankovski
Vinnie Okada
Marin JankovskiandDmitriy Zaporozhets
ash wilson