Emails are used to associate commits with users. The emails
are not verified and don't have to be valid email addresses. They
are assigned on a first come, first serve basis.
Notifications are sent when an email is added.
- Database name may contain characters which are not shell friendly
- Database password could contain the same
- While we at it there is no harm in escaping generated paths too
- Refactored 2-line system(command)
Signed-off-by: Nigel Kukard <nkukard@lbsd.net>
Previously, only number of changed files mattered. Now, number of lines to render in the diff are also taken into account.
A hard limit is set, above which diffs are not rendered and users are not allowed to override that. This prevents high server
resource usage with huge commits.
Related to #1745, #2259
In addition, handle large commits for MergeRequests and Compare controllers.
Also fixes a bug where diffs are loaded twice, if user goes directly to merge_requests/:id/diffs URL.
Any mention of Issues, MergeRequests, or Commits via GitLab-flavored markdown
references in descriptions, titles, or attached Notes creates a back-reference
Note that links to the original referencer. Furthermore, pushing commits with
commit messages that match a (configurable) regexp to a project's default
branch will close any issues mentioned by GFM in the matched closing phrase.
If accepting a merge request would close any Issues in this way, a banner is
appended to the merge request's main panel to indicate this.
-Some changes around calling origional methods for !for_fork? merge requests. Other changes to follow
Change-Id: I009c716ce2475b9efa3fd07aee9215fca7a1c150
The good:
- You can do a merge request for a forked commit and it will merge properly (i.e. it does work).
- Push events take into account merge requests on forked projects
- Tests around merge_actions now present, spinach, and other rspec tests
- Satellites now clean themselves up rather then recreate
The questionable:
- Events only know about target projects
- Project's merge requests only hold on to MR's where they are the target
- All operations performed in the satellite
The bad:
- Duplication between project's repositories and satellites (e.g. commits_between)
(for reference: http://feedback.gitlab.com/forums/176466-general/suggestions/3456722-merge-requests-between-projects-repos)
Fixes:
Make test repos/satellites only create when needed
-Spinach/Rspec now only initialize test directory, and setup stubs (things that are relatively cheap)
-project_with_code, source_project_with_code, and target_project_with_code now create/destroy their repos individually
-fixed remote removal
-How to merge renders properly
-Update emails to show project/branches
-Edit MR doesn't set target branch
-Fix some failures on editing/creating merge requests, added a test
-Added back a test around merge request observer
-Clean up project_transfer_spec, Remove duplicate enable/disable observers
-Ensure satellite lock files are cleaned up, Attempted to add some testing around these as well
-Signifant speed ups for tests
-Update formatting ordering in notes_on_merge_requests
-Remove wiki schema update
Fixes for search/search results
-Search results was using by_project for a list of projects, updated this to use in_projects
-updated search results to reference the correct (target) project
-udpated search results to print both sides of the merge request
Change-Id: I19407990a0950945cc95d62089cbcc6262dab1a8
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Sytse Sijbrandij
Ciro Santilli
Jeroen van Baarsen
Robert Speicher
Jacob Vosmaer
Jason Hollingsworth
Marin Jankovski
Nigel Kukard
Angus MacArthur
Boyan Tabakov
ash wilson
Johannes Schleifenbaum
Izaak Alpert
Izaak AlpertandIzaak Alpert