Revert vote buttons back to issue and MR pages
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/3672
/cc @dzaporozhets @JobV
See merge request !2206
Adding CRIME Vulnerability to Security doc
Added an additional page to the security section that goes over current status and fixes for the TLS Protocol CRIME Vulnerability. Also added its respective link at the security README.
Any suggestions appreciated @JobV @sytses
See merge request !2102
`git` doesn't work properly when `--follow` and `--skip` are specified together. We could even be **omitting commits in the Web log** as a result.
Here are the gory details. Let's say you ran:
```
git log -n=5 --skip=2 README
```
This is the working case since it omits `--follow`. This is what happens:
1. `git` starts at `HEAD` and traverses down the tree until it finds the top-most commit relevant to README.
2. Once this is found, this commit is returned via `get_revision_1()`.
3. If the `skip_count` is positive, decrement and repeat step 2. Otherwise go onto step 4.
4. `show_log()` gets called with that commit.
5. Repeat step 1 until we have all five entries.
That's exactly what we want. What happens when you use `--follow`? You have to understand how step 1 is performed:
* When you specify a pathspec on the command-line (e.g. README), a flag `prune` [gets set here](https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/revision.c#L2351).
* If the `prune` flag is active, `get_commit_action()` determines whether the commit should be [scanned for matching paths](https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/revision.c#L2989).
* In the case of `--follow`, however, `prune` is [disabled here](https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/revision.c#L2350).
* As a result, a commit is never scanned for matching paths and therefore never pruned. `HEAD` will always get returned as the first commit, even if it's not relevant to the README.
* Making matters worse, the `--skip` in the example above would actually skip every other after `HEAD` N times. If README were changed in these skipped commits, we would actually miss information!
Since git uses a matching algorithm to determine whether a file was renamed, I
believe `git` needs to generate a diff of each commit to do this and traverse
each commit one-by-one to do this. I think that's the rationale for disabling
the `prune` functionality since you can't just do a simple string comparison.
Closes#4181, #4229, #3574, #2410
Fix identity and user retrieval when special characters are used
Fixes#4023
I also added tests to make sure the user with special characters in his name is returned correctly.
@rspeicher this probably should be added to 8.3 as a patch.
See merge request !2176
Sytse Sijbrandij
Achilleas Pipinellis
Igor Matsko
Robert Speicher
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Valery Sizov
Douwe Maan
Valery SizovandValery Sizov
Stan Hu
Robert Speicher
Gabriel Mazetto