Replace commits calendar with contributions calendar
* count opening of issues and merge requests
* dont trigger git repository - use events from database
* count pushes instead of commits for faster and easier counting
* much-much faster since does not affected by repository size
See merge request !420
* count opening of issues and merge requests
* dont trigger git repository - use events from database
* much-much faster since does not affected by repository size
Location field in user profile
Twitter allows you to set string with location information.
I find it very useful in work to know where user from. It allows to communicate with knowing time difference and cultural things.
See merge request !411
Add support for external wikis
## What does this MR do?
This MR adds the possibility to replace the link to the internal wiki of gitlab with a custom link.
Currently this is realised as a service.
## What Use Case does this MR solve?
In my Company we already have a wiki System (Confluence).
We have a policy to use the existing wiki, so we can't switch to the internal wiki Gitlab provides.
This currently only leaves us two choices:
1. Disable the gitlab wiki. That means we completly loose the connection between wiki and code from the gitlab ui.
2. Create a simple wiki page with a link to our external wiki and hope that no one uses the internal one.
Both solutions are not really good.
So what can be done to improve the situation while making it as easy as possible for new developers to access both, wiki and gitlab?
Replacing the wiki link kinda like the JIRA integration replaces the issues link looks like a good first step to me. :)
This can probably be extended later to completly prevent access to the internal wiki (currently that's still possible if you know the link) or maybe to check if the link really points to a wiki.
## Screenshot:
See merge request !291
Check for nil values in the restricted_visibility_level validation
method, and set the restricted visibility request parameter to `[]` when
it's missing from the request.
Restricted visibility levels - bug fix and new feature
This allows admin users to override restricted visibility settings when creating and updating projects and snippets, and moves the restricted visibility configuration from gitlab.yml to the web UI. See #1903.
## Move configuration location
I added a new section to the application settings page for restricted visibility levels. Each level has a checkbox, styled with Bootstrap to look like a toggle button. A checked box means that the level is restricted. I added a glowing text shadow and changed the background color for checked buttons because the default styles made it hard to distinguish between checked and unchecked. This image shows the new section with the "Public" box checked:
## Allow admins to override
To allow admin users to override the restricted visibility levels, I had to remove the `visibility_level` validation from the `Project` class. The model doesn't know about the `current_user`, which should determine whether the restrictions can be overridden. We could use the creator in the validation, but that wouldn't work correctly for projects where a non-admin user is the creator and an admin tries to change the project to a restricted visibility level.
The `Project::UpdateService` and `Project::CreateService` classes already had code to determine whether the current user is allowed to use a given visibility level; now all visibility level validation is done in those classes. Currently, when a non-admin tries to create or update a project using a restricted level, these classes silently set the visibility level to the global default (create) or the project's existing value (update). I changed this behavior to be more like an Active Model validation, where using a restricted level causes the entire request to be rejected.
Project and personal snippets didn't have service classes, and restricted visibility levels weren't being enforced in the model or the controllers. The UI disabled radio buttons for restricted levels, but that wouldn't be difficult to circumvent. I created the `CreateSnippetService` and `UpdateSnippetService` classes to do the same restricted visibility check that the project classes do. And since I was dealing with snippet visibility levels, I updated the API endpoints for project snippets to allow users to set and update the visibility level.
## TODO
* [x] Add more tests for restricted visibility functionality
cc @sytse @dzaporozhets
See merge request !1655
It is same search like we have at issues page. It allows to quickly
filter merge requests based on title or desription. I copy-pasted some
js code from Issues.js. In future search (filtering) logic should be
refactoed into one class for merge requests and issues
Fix missing GitHub organisation repositories on import page.
Private repositories belonging to organizations rather than users can't be imported because `client.repos(org.login)` was requesting `/users/:org_login/repos` (which only returns public org repo's), while we need `/orgs/:org_login/repos` (which includes both public and private). The `client.org_repos` method does this.
cc @marin This is a bug in 7.8.x, but I'm not sure if it needs a minor release now or if it can go in 7.9.
See merge request !1683
Reject access to group/project avatar if the user doesn't have access.
Closes#2050.
I'll add tests for EE logos once this is merged here and merged into EE.
See merge request !1671
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Stan Hu
Valery Sizov
Carlos Ribeiro
Hannes Rosenögger
Dmitriy Zaporozhets
Douwe Maan
Vinnie Okada
Vinnie Okada
