Ci::Commit becomes a Pipeline object
1. Ci::Commit receives context: ref, :tag.
1. One Ci::Commit describes a one Pipeline
1. Pipeline is created from `.gitlab-ci.yml`
1. Pipeline is a ordered group of builds
1. We test MR against Pipeline
1. Pipelines have a separate view (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/3703)
1. Pipeline can be triggered from UI (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/3703)
1. Later we change `Trigger -> TriggerRequest -> Build` to `Trigger -> Pipeline` (future)
1. We add a Pipeline Hook that will be triggered on Pipeline status change (future)
1. We extend notifications to use `Pipeline Hook` to send summary on pipeline changes (future)
After merging that I'll prepare a separate MR that will unify naming, database columns, table names:
```
Ci::Commit -> Pipeline
Ci::Build -> Build
CommitStatus -> Job
GenericCommitStatus -> ExternalJob
ci_commits -> pipelines
ci_builds -> jobs
```
This MR implements first 5 points.
This is made to solve this issue https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14149.
See merge request !3653
Add due_date text field to sidebar issue#show
Add ability sorting issues by due date ASC and DESC
Add ability to filtering issues by No Due Date, Any Due Date, Due to tomorrow, Due in this week options
Add handling issue due_date field for MergeRequest
Update CHANGELOG
Fix ambigous match for issues#show sidebar
Fix SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE offenses for due date contants
Add specs for due date sorting and filtering on issues
add slack notifications for wiki pages
## What does this MR do?
Lets the Slack service be configured to send notifications when wiki pages are created or edited.
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
I'm just starting to get familiar with the Gitlab codebase and I was unsure on how to get the wiki page url to pass it to the slack message, on whether or not I needed to refactor the create/update methods for wiki pages from the controller to a service (but seemed necessary to test it better), and if I needed to add a column to the web hooks table or if the services table would have been enough. Please let me know if I should change anything and I will improve the MR, thanks for checking :)
## Why was this MR needed?
Related to #563 and fixes#4233.
See merge request !2998
Sanitize branch names for confidential issues
- When creating new branches for confidential issues, prefer a branch name like `issue-15` to `some-sensitive-issue-title-15`.
- The behaviour for non-confidential issues stays the same.
Closes#14566
See merge request !3671