home/gitolite
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/wahyd4/gitolite.git synced 2026-08-17 00:45:52 +10:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
gh-pages
gitolite/tips-notes-all.html
T

543 lines
22 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

<head>
<title>
assorted tips and notes
</title>
<style>
body { background: #fff; margin-left: 40px; font-size: 0.9em; font-family: sans-serif; max-width: 800px; }
h1 { background: #ffb; margin-left: -30px; border-top: 5px solid #ccc; }
h2 { background: #ffb; margin-left: -20px; border-top: 3px solid #ddd; }
h3 { background: #ffb; margin-left: -10px; }
h4 { background: #ffb; }
code { font-size: 1.1em; background: #ddf; }
pre { margin-left: 2em; background: #ddf; }
pre code { font-size: 1.1em; background: #ddf; }
</style>
</head>
<p style="text-align:center">
<a href="master-toc.html">master TOC</a>
|
<a href="master-toc.html#tips-notes">chapter TOC</a>
|
<a href="support.html">support</a>
</p>
<!-- file: tips "assorted tips and notes" -->
<h1>assorted tips and notes</h1>
<p><a name="tips_notes_common_errors_and_mistakes_"></a></p>
<h2>common errors and mistakes</h2>
<ul>
<li><p>adding <code>repositories/</code> at the start of the repo name in the <code>git clone</code>.
This error is typically made by the <em>admin</em> himself -- because he knows
what <code>$REPO_BASE</code> is set to and thinks he has to provide that prefix on
the client side also :-) In fact gitolite prepends <code>$REPO_BASE</code>
internally, so you shouldn't also do the same thing!</p></li>
<li><p>being able to clone but getting errors on push. Most likely caused by a
combination of:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>you already have shell access to the server, not just "gitolite"
access, <em>and</em></p></li>
<li><p>you cloned using <code>git clone git@server:repositories/repo.git</code> (notice
there's an extra "repositories/" in there?)</p></li>
</ul>
<p>In other words, you used a key that completely bypassed gitolite and went
straight to the shell to do the clone.</p>
<p><p>Please see doc/ssh-troubleshooting.mkd for what all this means.</p></li>
</ul>
<a name="tips_notes_other_errors_warnings_notes__"></a></p>
<h2>other errors, warnings, notes...</h2>
<p><a name="tips_notes_cloning_an_empty_repo_"></a></p>
<h3>cloning an empty repo</h3>
<p>Cloning an empty repo is only possible with clients greater than 1.6.2. So at
least one of your clients needs to have a recent git. Once at least one
commit has been made, older clients can also use it</p>
<p>When you clone an empty repo, git seems to complain about <code>fatal: The remote
end hung up unexpectedly</code>. However, you can ignore this, since it doesn't
seem to hurt anything. [Update 2009-09-14; this has been fixed in git
1.6.4.3]</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_all_syntax_for_repos_"></a></p>
<h3><code>@all</code> syntax for repos</h3>
<p>There <em>is</em> a way to use the <code>@all</code> syntax for repos also, as described in
<code>doc/gitolite.conf.mkd</code>. However, there are a couple of minor cautions:</p>
<ul>
<li>don't use <code>NAME/</code> or such restrictions on the special <code>@all</code> repo. Due to
the potential for defeating a crucial optimisation and slowing down <em>all</em>
access, we do not support this.</li>
</ul>
<p><a name="tips_notes_features_"></a></p>
<h2>features</h2>
<p>Apart from the big ones listed in the top level README, and subjective ones
like "better config file format", gitolite has evolved to have many useful
features than the original goal of branch-level access control.</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_syntax_and_normal_usage_"></a></p>
<h3>syntax and normal usage</h3>
<p><a name="multikey"></a></p>
<h4>one user, many keys</h4>
<p>If you have a user who has more than one pubkey (like from different machines)
the simplest way to deal with it is to add subdirectories and add keys there.
For example, I might have these files in <code>keydir/</code>:</p>
<pre><code>sitaram.pub
home/sitaram.pub
laptop/sitaram.pub
</code></pre>
<h5>old style multi keys: <a href="oldmultikeys.html" title="old style multi keys">Link</a></h5>
<!-- file: oldmultikeys "old style multi keys" -->
<h5>old style multi keys</h5>
<p>This is an older method of enabling multi-keys. It will continue to work and
be supported in <em>code</em>, simply because I prefer it. But I am not going to
document it except for the example below, nor am I going to support it in
terms of questions. Sorry. Apparently it was too complex to understand, even
for some smart folks I know. This tells me it was probably ill thought out
and should have been obsoleted as soon as e0fe73a was pushed.</p>
<p>Anyway, here's <em>all</em> the documentation for it -- some sample pubkey filenames
and the corresponding derived usernames:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>plain username, no multikey</p>
<pre><code>sitaramc.pub sitaramc
</code></pre></li>
<li><p>plain username, with multikeys</p>
<pre><code>sitaramc@laptop.pub sitaramc
sitaramc@desktop.pub sitaramc
</code></pre></li>
<li><p>email address as username, no multikey</p>
<pre><code>sitaramc@gmail.com.pub sitaramc@gmail.com
</code></pre></li>
<li><p>email address as username, with multikeys</p>
<pre><code>sitaramc@gmail.com@laptop.pub sitaramc@gmail.com
sitaramc@gmail.com@desktop.pub sitaramc@gmail.com
</code></pre></li>
</ul>
<!-- file: tips "security, access control, and auditing" -->
<h3>security, access control, and auditing: <a href="tipssec_.html" title="security, access control, and auditing">Link</a></h3>
<!-- file: tipssec_ "security, access control, and auditing" -->
<h3>security, access control, and auditing</h3>
<p><a name="2levels"></a></p>
<h4>two levels of access rights checking</h4>
<p>Gitolite has two levels of access checks. The <strong>first check</strong> is what I will
call the <strong>pre-git</strong> level. At this stage, the <code>gl-auth-command</code> has been
invoked by <code>sshd</code>, and it knows just three things:</p>
<ul>
<li>who,</li>
<li>what repository, and</li>
<li>what type of access (R or W)</li>
</ul>
<p>Note that at this point no git program has entered the picture, and we have no
way of knowing what <strong>ref</strong> (branch, tag, etc) he is trying to update, even if
it is a "write" operation.</p>
<p>For a "read" operation to pass this check, the username (or <code>@all</code> users) must
have read permission (i.e., R, RW, RW+, etc.) on at least one branch of the
repo (or <code>@all</code> repos).</p>
<p>For a "write" operation, there is an additional restriction: lines specifying
only <code>R</code> (read access) don't count. <em>The user must have write access to
<strong>some</strong> ref in the repo in order to pass this stage!</em></p>
<p>The <strong>second check</strong> is via a git <code>update hook</code>. This check only happens for
write operations. By this time we know what "ref" he is trying to update, as
well as the old and the new SHAs of that ref (by which we can also deduce
whether it's a rewind or not). This is where the "per-branch" permissions
come into play.</p>
<p>Each refex that allows <code>W</code> access (or <code>+</code> if this is a rewind) for <em>this</em>
user, on <em>this</em> repo, is matched against the actual refname being updated. If
any of the refexes match, the push succeeds. If none of them match, it fails.</p>
<p>Gitolite also allows "exclude" or "deny" rules. See later in this document
for details.</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_better_logging_"></a></p>
<h4>better logging</h4>
<p>If you have been too liberal with the permission to rewind, it has built-in
logging as an emergency fallback if someone goes too far, or for audit
purposes [<code>*</code>]. The logfile names and location are configurable, and can
include the year/month/day etc in the filename for easy archival or further
processing. The log file even tells you which pattern in the config file
matched to allow that specific access to proceed.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[<code>*</code>] setting <code>core.logAllRefUpdates true</code> does provide a safety net
against over-zealous rewinds, but it does not tell you "who". And
strangely, management does not seem to share the view that "blame" is just
a synonym for "annotate" ;-)]</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The log lines look like this:</p>
<pre><code>2009-09-19.10:24:37 + b4e76569659939 4fb16f2a88d8b5 myrepo refs/heads/master user2 refs/heads/master
</code></pre>
<p>The "+" at the start indicates a non-fast forward update, in this case from
b4e76569659939 to 4fb16f2a88d8b5. So b4e76569659939 is the one to restore!
Can it get easier?</p>
<p>The other parts of the log line are the name of the repo, the refname being
updated, the user updating it, and the refex pattern (from the config file)
that matched, in case you need to debug the config file itself.</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_delegating_parts_of_the_config_file_"></a></p>
<h4>delegating parts of the config file</h4>
<p>You can now split up the config file and delegate the authority to specify
access control for their own pieces. See <a href="deleg.html" title="delegating access control responsibilities">delegation</a> for details.</p>
<!-- file: tips "convenience features" -->
<h3>convenience features: <a href="tnconv_.html" title="convenience features">Link</a></h3>
<!-- file: tnconv_ "convenience features" -->
<h3>convenience features</h3>
<p><a name="tips_notes_what_repos_do_I_have_access_to__"></a></p>
<h4>what repos do I have access to?</h4>
<p>Sometimes there are too many repos, maybe even named similarly, or with the
potential for typos, confusion about hyphens/underscores or upper/lower case,
etc. You'd just like a simple way to know what repos you have access to.</p>
<p>Gitolite provides two commands (<a href="info_expand.html#info" title="the &quot;info&quot; command"><code>info</code></a> and <a href="info_expand.html#expand" title="the &quot;expand&quot; command"><code>expand</code></a>)
to help you find this information.</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_support_for_git_installed_outside_default_PATH_"></a></p>
<h4>support for git installed outside default PATH</h4>
<p>The normal solution is to add to the system default PATH somehow, either by
munging <code>/etc/profile</code> or by enabling <code>PermitUserEnvironment</code> in
<code>/etc/ssh/sshd_config</code> and then setting the PATH in <code>~/.ssh/.environment</code>.
All these are security risks because they allow a lot more than just you and
your git install :-)</p>
<p>And if you don't have root, you can't do this anyway.</p>
<p>The only solution till now has been to ask every client to set the config
parameters <code>remote.&lt;name&gt;.receivepack</code> and <code>remote.&lt;name&gt;.uploadpack</code>. But
telling <em>every</em> client to do so is a pain...</p>
<p>Gitolite lets you specify the directory in which git binaries are to be found,
via a new variable (<code>$GIT_PATH</code>) in the "rc" file. If this variable is
non-empty, it will be appended to the PATH environment variable before
attempting to run git stuff.</p>
<p>Very easy, very simple, and completely transparent to the users :-)</p>
<p><strong>Note</strong>: sometimes you have a system that already has an older "git"
installed in one of the system PATHs, but you've installed a newer git in some
non-standard location and want that picked up. Because of security reasons,
gitolite will not prepend <code>GIT_PATH</code> to the PATH variable, so the older git
comes first and it gets kinda frustrating!</p>
<p>Here's a simple workaround. Ignore the <code>GIT_PATH</code> variable, and directly set
the full PATH in the rc file, like so:</p>
<pre><code>$ENV{PATH} = "/home/sitaram/bin:$ENV{PATH}";
</code></pre>
<p><a name="pers"></a></p>
<h4>"personal" branches</h4>
<p>"personal" branches are great for corporate environments, where
unauthenticated pull/clone is a no-no. Since a dev workstation cannot do
authentication, even work shared just between 2 devs has to go <em>via</em> the
server. This causes the same branch name clutter as in a centralised VCS,
plus setting up permissions for this becomes a chore for the admin.</p>
<p>Personal branches exist <strong>in a namespace</strong> of their own. The syntax is</p>
<pre><code> RW+ personal/USER/ = @userlist
</code></pre>
<p>where the "personal" can be anything you like (but cannot be empty), and the
"/USER/" part is <strong>necessary (including both slashes)</strong>. A user "alice" (if
she's in the userlist) can then push any branches inside <code>personal/alice/</code>.
Which means she can push <code>personal/alice/foo</code> and <code>personal/alice/bar</code>, but
NOT <code>personal/alice</code>.</p>
<p>(Background: at runtime the "USER" component will be replaced by the name of
the invoking user. Access is determined by the right hand side, as usual).</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_custom_hooks_and_custom_git_config_"></a></p>
<h4>custom hooks and custom git config</h4>
<p>You can specify hooks that you want to propagate to all repos, as well as
per-repo "gitconfig" settings. Please see <code>doc/2-admin.mkd</code> and
<code>doc/gitolite.conf.mkd</code> for details.</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_bypassing_gitolite_"></a></p>
<h4>bypassing gitolite</h4>
<p>Sometimes you'll need to access one of the gitolite-managed repos directly on
the server, without going through gitolite. Reasons may be some automatic
updates or some other ad hoc purposes you can dream up.</p>
<p>Cloning a gitolite-controlled repo is easy enough -- just use the full path
(typically <code>~/repositories/reponame.git</code>) instead of just <code>reponame</code>, to
compensate for gitolite not sitting in between and adding those things to the
repo path.</p>
<p>But when you push, the update hook (which git will invoke anyway) will fail
because it needs all sorts of access control info that it now doesn't have,
because the push was invoked without going through gitolite.</p>
<p>In order to bypass the update hook, just set the <code>GL_BYPASS_UPDATE_HOOK</code>
environment variable to "1" or something, export it, and push. I prefer not
to set that variable permanently, preferring this mode instead:</p>
<pre><code>GL_BYPASS_UPDATE_HOOK=1 git push
</code></pre>
<h4>gl-admin-push: bypassing gitolite for the gitolite-admin repo: <a href="adminpush.html" title="gl-admin-push: bypassing gitolite for the gitolite-admin repo">Link</a></h4>
<!-- file: adminpush "gl-admin-push: bypassing gitolite for the gitolite-admin repo" -->
<h4>gl-admin-push: bypassing gitolite for the gitolite-admin repo</h4>
<p>The method described in the previous section (setting <code>GL_BYPASS_UPDATE_HOOK</code>)
will work for all the repos managed by gitolite, <strong>except</strong> for the special
<code>gitolite-admin</code> repo. For that you will need some extra magic, because there
is also a <code>post-update</code> hook that runs here, and this needs additional
information which is NOT available if you bypass gitolite.</p>
<p>(Note: If your gitolite is too old to have the <code>gl-admin-push</code> program, try
<code>gl-dont-panic</code>; run it without arguments for usage info. If you don't even
have that, it may be best to <a href="install.html#clean" title="appendix b: cleaning out a botched install">clean</a> things out more thoroughly!)</p>
<p>Use the <code>gl-admin-push</code> program to make changes to the admin repo <em>directly on
the server</em>. Here's how:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>clone the repo to some safe location and cd to it:</p>
<pre><code>cd /tmp
git clone ~/repositories/gitolite-admin.git
cd gitolite-admin
</code></pre></li>
<li><p>make whatever changes you want to that clone and commit. You can add new
keys, change the conf file, or anything at all that needs fixing up. You
can even reset to an older commit (rewind) if that is the simplest way to
fix up some config problem that may have lost you your access.</p></li>
<li><p>when done, instead of <code>git push &lt;push arguments&gt;</code>, use this program
instead. For example, instead of <code>git push -f</code>, use <code>gl-admin-push -f</code>.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Note that this method will work for <em>any</em> repo, not just the special admin
repo.</p>
<!-- file: tnconv_ "disabling write access to take backups" -->
<p><a name="disable"></a></p>
<h4>disabling write access to take backups</h4>
<p>If you want to take normal, OS-level, backups of the system, you might want
git to be quiescent during that time, so that the backup is clean. The best
way to do this is to disable write-access to the server for the duration of
the backup.</p>
<p>Here's how:</p>
<pre><code>cd $HOME # if running as "git" user, else "cd ~git" or whatever
echo writes disabled during backup window &gt; .gitolite.down
# &lt;&lt; RUN YOUR BACKUP COMMAND(s) HERE &gt;&gt;
rm .gitolite.down
</code></pre>
<p>I leave it to you to</p>
<ul>
<li>make sure that if the backup script fails, the <code>.gitolite.down</code> file is
still removed (or not; maybe your policy is that if the backup failed, no
further writes are allowed. Whatever...)</li>
<li>if you're extremely paranoid (even I wouldn't worry about this!) make sure
that no push is <em>in progress</em> by checking for any <code>git-receive-pack</code>
processes in a <code>ps</code> output.</li>
</ul>
<!-- file: tips "INconvenience features" -->
<p><a name="tips_notes_INconvenience_features_"></a></p>
<h3>INconvenience features</h3>
<p><a name="repodel"></a></p>
<h4>deleting a repo</h4>
<p>By design, there is no code in gitolite to <em>delete</em> a repo if the repo was
specified by name in the config file. (Wildcard repos <em>can</em> be deleted by the
user; see <a href="wild_repodel.html" title="deleting repos safely">here</a> for details).</p>
<p>If you <em>do</em> want to permanently delete a <em>non</em>-wildcard repo, here's what you
do:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>remove the repo from the gitolite-admin repo clone's <code>conf/gitolite.conf</code>
file. "add" the change, commit, and push.</p></li>
<li><p><em>then</em> remove the repo from <code>~/repositories</code> on the server (or whatever
you set <code>$REPO_BASE</code> to in the <code>~/.gitolite.rc</code>)</p></li>
</ul>
<p><a name="tips_notes_renaming_a_repo_"></a></p>
<h4>renaming a repo</h4>
<p>This is similar; there's no code to do this in gitolite. What you do is:</p>
<ul>
<li>log on to the server, <code>cd $REPO_BASE</code> (default: <code>cd ~/repositories</code>), and
<code>mv old-name.git new-name.git</code></li>
<li>back on your gitolite-admin clone, edit <code>conf/gitolite.conf</code> and replace
all occurrences of <code>old-name</code> with <code>new-name</code>. Then add, commit, and push
as usual.</li>
</ul>
<p>The order of these 2 steps is important; do not reverse them :-)</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_helping_with_gitweb_"></a></p>
<h3>helping with gitweb</h3>
<p>Although gitweb is a completely separate program, gitolite can do quite a
lot to help you manage gitweb access as well; once the initial setup is
complete, you can do it all from within the gitolite config file!</p>
<p>If you just want gitweb to show some repositories, see <a href="confother_.html#gwd" title="specifying gitweb and daemon access">here</a> for how to
specify which repos to show.</p>
<p><a name="gitwebauth"></a></p>
<h4>easier to link gitweb authorisation with gitolite</h4>
<p>Over and above whether a repo is even <em>shown</em> by gitweb, you may want to
further restrict people, allowing them to view <em>only</em> those repos for which
they have been given read access by gitolite.</p>
<p>This requires that:</p>
<ul>
<li>you have to have some sort of HTTP auth on your web server (out of my
scope, sorry!)</li>
<li>the HTTP auth should use the same username (like "sitaram") as used in the
gitolite config (for the corresponding user)</li>
</ul>
<p>Normally a superuser sets up passwords for users using the "htpasswd" command,
but this is an administrative chore.</p>
<p>Robin Smidsrød had the <em>great</em> idea that, since each user already has pubkey
access to <code>git@server</code>, this gives us a very neat way of using gitolite to let
the users <em>manage their own HTTP passwords</em>. Here's how:</p>
<ul>
<li>setup apache so that the htaccess file it looks for is owned by the "git"
user</li>
<li>in the <code>~/.gitolite.rc</code> file, look for the variable <code>$HTPASSWD_FILE</code> and
point it to this file</li>
<li>tell your users to type in <code>ssh git@server htpasswd</code> to set or change
their HTTP passwords</li>
</ul>
<p>Of course some other authentication method can be used (e.g. <code>mod_ldap</code>) as
long as the usernames match.</p>
<p>Gitweb allows you to specify a subroutine to decide on access. We use that
feature and tie it to gitolite. Configuration example can be found in
<code>contrib/gitweb/</code>.</p>
<p><a name="umask"></a></p>
<h4>umask setting</h4>
<p>Gitweb not able to read your repos? You can change the umask for newly
created repos to something more relaxed -- see the <code>REPO_UMASK</code> setting in the
<a href="rc.html" title="configuring gitolite's advanced features -- the `.gitolite.rc` file">rc file documentation</a>.</p>
<p><a name="tips_notes_advanced_features_"></a></p>
<h3>advanced features</h3>
<p>There are some really cool features that are now in pretty wide use.</p>
<ul>
<li><p><strong><a href="wild.html" title="repositories named with wildcards">repos named with wildcards</a></strong> is useful when some or most of your
repos fit a pattern, avoiding the need to name repos individually in the
config file. New repos matching the pattern can be created by any user
(if you give them rights to), with a set of permissions assigned to
"roles", and the creator can then place users into those roles.</p></li>
<li><p><strong><a href="ADCs.html" title="admin defined commands">admin defined commands</a></strong> allow controlled access to specific
commands and scripts without giving users full shell access.</p></li>
</ul>
<p><a name="tips_notes_odds_and_ends_"></a></p>
<h3>odds and ends</h3>
<p><a name="tips_notes_poking_the_admin_repo_to_force_a_compile_"></a></p>
<h4>"poking" the admin repo to force a compile</h4>
<p>Sometimes you need to force a compile, as if you pushed the gitolite-admin
repo. I have a git alias that looks like this:</p>
<pre><code>[alias]
poke = !git ls-remote origin | grep -w refs/heads/poke &amp;&amp; git push origin :poke || git push origin master:poke
</code></pre>
<p>so I just run <code>git poke</code>. This toggles between deleting and creating a dummy
branch called "poke". Either operation will trigger the hooks.</p>
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink