---
title: 2025-04-26-technology
created: 2025-04-26
updated: 2025-04-26
type: summary
tags: ["newsletter", "technology"]
external: http://go/ui/posts/606/
status: inbox
---

<think>
Okay, let me see what I need to do here. The user wants an 8-item bulletin summary in Chinese with each item having the original link in markdown format. They provided a bunch of news articles, and the instructions say to pick the biggest headlines, merge duplicates, and only include the top stories.

First, I'll go through all the provided news items to identify duplicates. Scanning through, I notice that some articles are repeated. For example, "How a Little-Known Finnish Company..." appears twice in both WSJ links, but they're the same article. The same applies to "Meta Spending to Soar on AI..." and others. I need to count how many times each headline appears to determine their importance based on frequency as per the user's note.

Next, I'll look for the most significant topics. The Finnish company (Oura Ring) is mentioned twice, so that's a big one. Meta's AI spending is also a major tech investment. Alphabet/Google's earnings and their ad business are covered in a few articles, so that's important. The DeepSeek data transfer issue with South Korea is a regulatory matter, which is significant. Intel cutting expenses is a key corporate move. The Trump-related memecoin controversies (delayed sales, ethics probe) are recurring and politically charged. The partnership between Pony.ai and Tencent in autonomous vehicles is a notable collaboration. Lastly, California's self-driving regulations affecting major companies like Tesla and Waymo is a regulatory change to note.

I need to make sure each entry is unique. For instance, the Alphabet articles have two entries but they're about the same earnings report, so they should be merged. The Trump meme coin has multiple entries but can be condensed into one or two points. The California regulations are mentioned twice but are the same news.

Now, translating the titles into Chinese accurately. Need to check the URLs to ensure they're correctly matched. Also, the descriptions should be concise but informative.

Let me list them:

1. **Tech news**  
- [Oura智能戒指成为全球最热门的可穿戴设备公司](https://www.wsj.com/articles/ec1b3d09)  
芬兰公司Oura Ring通过监测心脏健康和预测疾病成为智能穿戴领域的领先企业。  
- [Meta将大幅增加AI和数据中心投资](https://www.wsj.com/articles/9452a88f)  
Meta计划投入600亿至650亿美元，显示科技公司加速在AI领域的投入。  
- [Alphabet广告业务面临挑战但搜索业务表现强劲](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/24/alphabet-googl-q1-earnings-report-2025.html)  
尽管面临AI竞争，Alphabet一季度财报显示搜索和广告收入超预期增长。  
- [SEC主席称加密货币创新受阻，监管趋严](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/sec-chair-atkins-says-crypto-innovation-been-stifled.html)  
SEC主席Paul Atkins表示加密行业创新受阻，但监管态度转向温和。  
- [Intel削减开支应对财务压力](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/24/intel-intc-q1-2025-earnings-report.html)  
Intel新CEO Tan上任首份财报显示将大幅削减运营及资本支出。  
- [特朗普memecoin争议引发国会调查](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/trump-dinner-for-meme-coin-prompts-senators-to-demand-ethics-probe.html)  
特朗普推广的memecoin事件引发Schiff和Warren参议员要求伦理调查。  
- [腾讯与Pony.ai合作推进自动驾驶服务](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/ponyai-teams-up-with-tencent-for-robotaxi-services-on-wechat-other-apps.html)  
双方将在微信等平台部署自动驾驶出租车服务。  
- [加州新规严格自动驾驶测试，影响Waymo、特斯拉等](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/california-is-overhauling-its-autonomous-vehicle-regulations.html)  
新规将影响Waymo、Tesla等公司的自动驾驶车辆测试和运营。

Wait, but need to check the URLs. For example, the DeepSeek data transfer to China might be another important item but I didn't include it yet. Let me check again.

Looking back, the South Korea DeepSeek数据泄露事件 is another key point about user data transfer without consent. That's a data privacy issue with international implications, so that's important. That's item 9, so need to replace one of the others. Let me recount.

Original list after duplicates removed:

1. Oura Ring成为热门
2. Meta的 AI spending
3. Alphabet earnings and ad business (merged two entries)
4. SEC监管加密货币
5. Intel削减开支
6. Trump的 memecoin争议（合并多个相关条目）
7. Pony.ai与腾讯合作
8. 加州自动驾驶新规
9. DeepSeek数据泄露事件

Ah, so I need to include that. So maybe I need to replace one of the entries. The user wants 8 items. Which is more important? The DeepSeek数据泄露 is a regulatory action by South Korea against a Chinese company, which is significant for data security and international business. That's probably more important than, say, the SEC's crypto comments, but both are relevant. Alternatively, the Alphabet and Google entries are two different angles but could be merged. Let me see the original list again.

Wait, the user's instruction says "merge them into one item if they occur more than once". The Alphabet entries: there are two about Alphabet's ad business and earnings. They can be merged into one entry. Then the DeepSeek data transfer is a separate point. Let's see:

Possible revised list:

1. Oura智能戒指
2. Meta的 AI投资
3. Alphabet财报显示广告业务承压但搜索强劲
4. 深 Seeking 数据违规被韩国起诉
5. Intel削减开支
6. 特朗普memecoin争议及国会调查
7. 腾讯与Pony.ai自动驾驶合作
8. 加州自动驾驶新规

That's 8. The SEC's监管 can be merged with the crypto part, since the SEC's statement about stifled innovation is part of the crypto meme coin's context. Maybe combine the SEC and the memecoin parts into one, but the memecoin is a specific case. Alternatively, since the user wants headlines, the memecoin scandal with Trump is a big headline, and the SEC's stance is a separate regulatory move. So maybe keep both:

Wait, the user wants 8 items. Let me count again the key points:

- Oura Ring (2x)
- Meta's AI spending (2x)
- Alphabet earnings and ad business (3 entries)
- DeepSeek数据泄露 (2x)
- Intel的 financial move (2x)
- Trump's memecoin issues (4 entries)
- Pony.ai与腾讯 (2x)
- 加州自动驾驶新规 (2x)
- SEC的 crypto监管 (2x)
- Amazon卖家涨价 (2x)
- 其他 like the roundups are less important.

The user says to pick big news and headlines. The Tech, Media & Telecom Roundup is probably less important. The Bill Gates interview might be less critical. Amazon sellers raising prices due to tariffs is significant but maybe on the business/economy side. The user wants tech news, so maybe focus on tech companies' moves and regulations.

So prioritizing:

1. Oura Ring (2x) — definitely a startup hit
2. Meta's $60B+ AI investment — major tech spending
3. Alphabet's earnings and ad business (merged) — major company's performance
4. DeepSeek数据违规 — regulatory action against a Chinese firm
5. Intel削减开支 — major chip company's strategy
6. 特朗普的 memecoin争议 (合并多个条目) — political and crypto scandal
7. Pony.ai与腾讯 — autonomous driving partnership
8. 加州自动驾驶新规 — affects major players like Tesla

That's 8. The SEC's crypto comments and the memecoin's $900k profit and ethics probe can be merged into the Trump memecoin item. The Amazon sellers part might be less tech-focused, so omit. The SEC's stance on crypto can be a separate item but maybe combine with the memecoin as it's related. Alternatively, the SEC's regulatory move is a headline as well. Hmm.

Wait the user specified "tech news" so maybe crypto and regulations around it count. So maybe replace the Amazon one with the SEC's point. Let me see:

Possible entries:

1. Oura Ring
2. Meta的 AI spending
3. Alphabet的 earnings & ad headwinds
4. DeepSeek data transfer issue
5. Intel expense cuts
6. 特朗普memecoin争议及监管压力
7. Pony.ai与腾讯合作
8. 加州自动驾驶新规

That's 8. The SEC's statement about crypto stifled创新 is important but maybe merged into the memecoin's regulatory issues? Or keep it as a separate point. Alternatively, the SEC's Crypto Task Force activity is a regulatory headline, so maybe include that as an 8th point, replacing Pony.ai? Hmm, the Pony合作 is a key partnership. 

Alternatively, the user might prioritize the memecoin scandal as a bigger headline due to Trump involvement. Since the user says to select big news and headlines, the memecoin with Senate probe and SEC's crypto stance are both big, but perhaps they can be in two separate entries. But that would make 9. So need to choose.

Alternatively, the SEC's statement and the memecoin scandal could form one entry about crypto regulation and controversy. Let me see:

- 特朗普memecoin丑闻及监管压力  
  包括参议员要求调查，SEC态度转变等.

Combine the memecoin's $900k, the ethics probe, and the SEC's comments into one entry. That way, that's one item covering multiple points. The SEC's roundtable is part of regulatory changes, which could be another point. Alternatively, prioritize the memecoin scandal as the main crypto news.

Alternatively, prioritize the most impactful ones. Let me list all the top 8:

- Oura Ring (2x)
- Meta的 $60B
- Alphabet earnings (merged)
- DeepSeek data transfer
- Intel's cuts
- 特朗普 memecoin controversy (combining the ethics probe and the SEC's stance)
- Pony & Tencent
- 加州自动驾驶新规

That's 8. The SEC's Crypto Task Force could be merged into the memecoin scandal, as it's about crypto regulation. The memecoin was part of crypto innovation, so combining SEC's comments with the memecoin issues as a single point: 特朗普memecoin丑闻与加密货币监管动态, including the SEC's stance and the ethics probe. 

Alternatively, if need to have 8:

Remove the SEC's point and include the memecoin as a separate item. But perhaps the user considers crypto as part of tech news. Let me structure it this way:

Also, the DeepSeek data transfer is a big deal between S. Korea and China, so that's important. So maybe the 8 items are:

1. Oura Ring
2. Meta's AI spending
3. Alphabet's earnings and ad headwind
4. DeepSeek data transfer issue
5. Intel's expense cuts
6. 特朗普 memecoin争议及监管
7. Pony and Tencent合作
8. 加州自动驾驶新规

That's 8. The SEC's point could be part of the memecoin entry. Alternatively, the SEC's statement is a separate headline, but the memecoin is also a big one. Hmm. Maybe the SEC's move is part of the crypto scene, but the memecoin is a specific case. 

Alternatively, the user might prefer the memecoin and SEC as separate entries. Let me count again:

Including the SEC's move as separate would make it 9 entries. To stay at 8, need to omit one. The SEC's statement is a regulatory headline, so perhaps more important than Pony's partnership?

Alternatively, the memecoin's $900k and the ethics probe are part of the same event, so one entry. The SEC's comments can be another entry. But that's two entries. Hmm.

Alternatively, the SEC's comment is part of the memecoin's regulatory environment. The user wants concise, so maybe combine:

"SEC主席称加密货币创新受阻，特朗普memecoin引发国会调查". But maybe better to keep them separate for clarity.

Alternatively, pick the most impactful ones. Let me proceed with the 8 mentioned earlier, including the SEC's point:

Wait, the SEC's "Crypto innovation has been stifled" is a regulatory headline, important. So perhaps:

1. Oura Ring
2. Meta's AI spending
3. Alphabet's financial performance and ad business
4. 深 Seeking数据泄露事件
5. Intel的 expense reduction
6. 特朗普 memecoin争议及国会调查
7. SEC监管加密货币创新
8. 加州自动驾驶新规

Then omit Pony's partnership? But the Pony合作 is a significant partnership. Alternatively, maybe the Alphabet and the memecoin's SEC connection is better. Hmm, this is a bit tricky, but I'll proceed with the initial list and adjust:

The user's instruction says "merge them into one item if occurs more than once". The memecoin entries are multiple, so merged into one. The Alphabet articles can be merged into one. The SEC's crypto stance is a separate item but perhaps part of the memecoin's context.

Proceeding to write them in Chinese, ensuring each has a unique URL. Also check URLs for correctness. For example, the 深 Seeking article has two links but need to pick the correct URL. Also, ensuring no markdown except the markdown format given. Also descriptions should be concise.

Also, the Amazon sellers raising prices due to tariffs might be less tech-focused, so excluding. The California自动驾驶 regulations are important.

So final list:

1. 芬兰公司Oura Ring成为全球热门可穿戴设备公司

2. Meta计划投入600-650亿美元发展AI和数据中心

3. Alphabet一季度财报显示广告业务承压但搜索业务增长强劲

4. 深Seek数据违规事件：韩国指控其非法转移用户数据至中国和美国

5. Intel削减开支应对财务压力

6. 特朗普memecoin争议：内幕交易延迟及参议院要求调查

7. 腾讯与 Pony.ai合作推进自动驾驶出租车服务

8. 加州新规严格自动驾驶测试规定，影响Waymo、特斯拉等

That's 8 items. The SEC's crypto comments and the memecoin can be in the Trump memecoin entry. The SEC's move is a separate entry but might be better combined into the memecoin's context. Alternatively, the SEC's statement is a separate regulatory highlight. But given the limit, merging SEC's part into the memecoin's entry as part of the broader crypto context might help. Alternatively, the SEC's comment is a separate item, pushing out one of the others. Since the user wants 8, let's proceed with the above list.

Now, translating the titles and ensuring the URLs are correct. Check for duplicates in the URLs. For example, the memecoin's entries have different URLs for different aspects. The main memecoin entry would take one URL, perhaps the ethics probe one. Also, the Alphabet's two entries can be merged into one entry combining its earnings growth and ad challenges.

Double-checking the URLs provided in the given data, ensuring each entry's URL is correct. For example, the SEC's URL is https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/sec-chair-atkins... 

Okay, I'll structure each point with the most relevant URL. Alright, now compose each bullet point in Chinese with the title translated, the URL, and a brief description.
</think>

**科技新闻**  
- [芬兰初创公司Oura智能戒指成全球热门健康穿戴设备](https://www.wsj.com/articles/ec1b3d09)  
Oura戒指通过监测心脏健康和疾病预测功能引发关注。  
- [Meta计划投入600亿至650亿美元发展AI及数据中心基建](https://www.wsj.com/articles/9452a88f)  
Meta大幅增加AI投资，反映科技公司加速布局人工智能领域。  
- [Alphabet一季度财报显示广告业务承压但搜索广告仍强劲增长](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/24/alphabet-googl-q1-earnings-report-2025.html)  
尽管面临AI竞争，Alphabet搜索与广告收入超预期。  
- [韩国指控中国AI公司DeepSeek非法转移用户数据至中、美](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/24/south-korea-says-deepseek-transferred-user-data.html)  
韩国数据监管机构指控DeepSeek违反用户数据跨境传输规定。  
- [Intel新CEO Tan宣布削减运营成本应对财务压力](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/24/intel-intc-q1-2025-earnings-report.html)  
Intel将大幅削减运营及资本支出以改善财务状况。  
- [特朗普memecoin内幕交易受阻及国会要求伦理调查](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/trump-dinner-for-meme-coin-prompts-senators-to-demand-ethics-probe.html)  
特朗普推广的memecoin内幕交易被延迟，参议院要求调查其推广行为。  
- [腾讯与Pony.ai合作推进微信端自动驾驶出租车服务](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/ponyai-teams-up-with-tencent-for-robotaxi-services-on-wechat-other-apps.html)  
双方将合作在WeChat等平台部署自动驾驶出租车服务。  
- [加州新规严格自动驾驶测试，Waymo、特斯拉等企业受影响](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/25/california-is-overhauling-its-autonomous-vehicle-regulations.html)  
加州新规要求自动驾驶公司调整车辆测试及运营模式。
