---
title: 2025-04-29-victoria
created: 2025-04-29
updated: 2025-04-29
type: summary
tags: ["local_news", "newsletter"]
external: http://go/ui/posts/617/
---

<think>
Okay, let's tackle this query step by step. The user wants an 8-item concise bulletin summary in Chinese, using markdown, for Melbourne local and Australian news. They mentioned merging duplicates and prioritizing big news. The output should only include the news titles, links, and descriptions in Chinese, no markdown syntax like ```markdown.

First, I'll go through the provided news items to identify which are most important. The key here is to pick the biggest headlines. Let me list out all the titles again to see which ones are duplicates or similar. 

Looking at the list, there are a few items about Welcome to Country and Anzac Day, particularly involving Peter Dutton and Anthony Albanese. The items titled "Not that day" and "Welcome to Country is overdone" from SBS both relate to Dutton's stance on Welcome to Country ceremonies. These should be merged since they're on the same topic. Similarly, the items about Dutton and Albanese defending their candidates are separate entries but can be combined into one if they're part of the same political controversy. 

Next, check if any other duplicates exist. The "Neo-Nazis are the problem..." from The Age is a reader response to the Welcome to Country issue, so it's related but might stand alone as a separate but related point. 

Now, looking for big news: The PM's comments on Adolescence and the $20M funding for violence services is significant. The ketamine nasal spray for depression being added to the PBS is a major health policy news. The $760M funding from Labor by increasing student visa fees is a key election promise. The Bondi stabbing inquest is a crime story of note. Gardiners Creek development is a local Melbourne environmental issue. The Vietnamese community's 50th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon is historical and community-focused. The visa refusal for African students is an immigration issue. 

I need to pick 8 items. The merged Dutton/Albanese candidate defenses would count as one, so the total would be:

1. Albanese on Adolescence and funding
2. Merged Dutton/Albanese defense (merged two items)
3. Ketamine nasal spray
4. Labor's $760M via visa fees
5. Bondi stabbing inquest
6. Gardiners Creek development
7. Vietnamese Fall of Saigon memorial
8. African students' visa refusal

Wait, that's 8 items. Let me check again. The original list has 13 items. Need to exclude the less critical ones. The Monique Ryan volunteer video and the political influencers debate seem less impactful. The "My suburb..." article is more of a local interest piece but not top news. The Neo-Nazis comment is a reader reaction, which might not be as critical as the main controversy. So merging the Dutton/Albanese candidate defense into one item, and the two Welcome to Country items into one. Wait, the user said if duplicated, merge into one and put first. The Dutton comments on Welcome to Country are two separate entries, so merge those into one. 

Wait, the user instruction says: if duplicates exist (meaning the same news is covered by multiple entries), merge them. So first identify which are duplicates. Let me check again:

- The items titled "Not that day" and "Welcome to Country is overdone" both discuss Dutton's stance on Welcome to Country. These are duplicates in terms of the main topic, so they should be merged as the primary topic is Dutton opposing Welcome to Country. 

Similarly, the "Dutton, Albanese forced to defend candidates..." is another topic, so that's separate. 

Thus, merging the two Dutton-Welcome to Country items into one, since they're about the same issue. The resulting merged item would be the main controversy about Welcome to Country on Anzac Day and Dutton's comments. That becomes the first item as per user's instruction (since it's duplicated, meaning more important). 

Now, arrange the remaining items, selecting the biggest ones. The PM's announcement is federal, so big. The $20M for violence services is important. The visa fee increase is a major policy. The PBS approval is major health news. The Bondi stabbing inquest is a high-profile crime. Gardiners Creek development is a local Melbourne issue. The Vietnamese 50th anniversary is significant for the community. The visa refusal is also a big immigration issue. 

Now, check if any others are more critical. The political influencers debate and volunteer video are less key, so exclude them. The suburban article is less impactful. The Neo-Nazis comment is part of the Welcome to Country debate but can be merged under the Dutton point. So the total after merging is:

1. Merged Dutton-Welcome to Country controversy (as it's duplicated)
2. Albanese's Adolescence and funding ($20M)
3. Dutton and Albanese defending candidates (merged as they're about defending their candidates, even if two entries)
Wait, the third entry in the list was about defending candidates. Wait, looking back, the third item in the user's input is "Dutton, Albanese forced to defend candidates..." which is separate from the Welcome to Country. So that's a separate topic. So merging only the Dutton-Welcome to Country items. 

Wait, the first item about "Not that day" is about Welcome to Country on Anzac Day, and the other Dutton item is him calling it "overdone." So they can be merged into one entry about Dutton's criticism of Welcome to Country. That would be the first item as it's duplicated. 

Then the other items: the PM's Adolescence and funding. The funding via visa fees. The ketamine nasal spray. Bondi stabbing inquest. Gardiners Creek development (Melbourne local). The Vietnamese 50th. African visa refusal. 

Wait, that's 8 items:

1. Dutton-Welcome to Country
2. Albanese's Adolescence and funding
3. Candidates' defense by both leaders (merged into one point)
4. Ketamine nasal spray
5. Labor's visa fee increase
6. Bondi stabbing
7. Gardiners Creek (Melbourne local)
8. Vietnamese Fall of Saigon

Wait, that's 8. The African visa refusal might be number 9, but need to pick only the top 8. Alternatively, maybe the visa refusal is a big issue, so include that. Wait the user said to only include big news and headlines. The visa refusal for African students is important. Let me count again:

After merging the two Dutton-Welcome items into one, that's 1. 

Then the other items:

2. Albanese's comments on Adolescence and violence funding
3. Dutton and Albanese defending candidates (merged from two entries)
4. Ketamine nasal spray added to PBS (big healthcare news)
5. Labor's funding via visa fees (election policy)
6. Bondi stabbing inquest (crime story)
7. Gardiners Creek development (Melbourne local)
8. Vietnamese memorial (community/cultural)
9. African student visa refusal (immigration issue)

Hmm, 9 items. Need to cut one. Which one is less critical? The African student visa refusal is definitely a significant issue, so maybe the candidates' defense can be condensed into one point but maybe it's still important. Alternatively, the Gardeners Creek is a local Melbourne issue but perhaps less national. Alternatively, the visa refusal is critical. Let me see the user's note: "only select BIG NEWS and HEADLINES". The candidates' defense (item 3) is political but might be major. The visa fee increase is a key policy. The ketamine is a major health story. The Vietnamese 50th anniversary is significant. The stabbing inquest is a big crime case. Gardiners Creek is a local development issue in Melbourne, so that's local. The merged items bring us to 8. Wait, if I count each merged item as 1, then:

1. Dutton's Welcome to Country criticism (merged from two entries)
2. Albanese's drama and violence funding
3. Candidates' defense (merged two entries)
4. Ketamine nasal spray
5. Visa fee increase
6. Bondi stabbing
7. Gardiners Creek (local)
8. Vietnamese 50th

That's 8. The African visa refusal would be the 9th, but maybe the user wants exactly 8. Alternatively, perhaps the visa refusal is more important than Gardiners Creek? The user specified to include Melbourne local news as well, so need to have some local items. The Gardeners Creek development is a local issue, so it's worth including. The African visa refusal might be a headline, so perhaps replacing one of the others. Alternatively, maybe the candidates' defense is important enough to keep, so the African one might be 9th. But the user wants 8 items. Let's prioritize. Since the user says "merge duplications and put first", the top ones are the merged Welcome to Country as the first item. Then the other top items. The visa refusal is a significant news item, so maybe replace the candidates' defense with visa refusal? Or keep both? The candidates' defense is about leaders defending their candidates, which is a political headline. The visa refusal involves visa denials affecting international students, which is big news. It's a tough call. Maybe include both? Wait, how many total? Let me recount with that in mind. After merging duplicates, the count is:

Original items after merging duplicates:

1. (merged) Dutton's opposition to Welcome to Country (from items 2 and 13)
2. Albanese's Adolescence (item1)
3. Dutton & Albanese defending candidates (item3)
4. Ketamine nasal spray (item4)
5. Labor's $760M via visa fees (item5)
6. Bondi stabbing (item6)
7. Gardiners Creek (item7)
8. Vietnamese memorial (item10)
9. African visa refusal (item11)

So total 9. Need to choose 8. Which one to exclude? Maybe the candidates' defense (item3) might be a necessary political story, but maybe the visa refusal is more impactful. Alternatively, the candidates' defense is about political leaders defending their candidates, which is a headline. Alternatively, the visa refusal is a clear headline. Let's see: the user asked to pick big news and headlines. The visa refusal (item11) is about denying visas to students for a cultural performance, which is a human interest and immigration story. The candidates' defense is a political issue. Since the user wants 8 items, perhaps exclude one. Alternatively, the user might consider the visa refusal and the candidates' defense both as top. Maybe the candidates' defense is part of the election campaigning and thus important. Let's see which is more impactful. The visa refusal denial leading to tour cancellation is a clear headline. So perhaps the candidates' defense and visa refusal both make the cut. 

Alternatively, maybe the candidates' defense is part of election coverage, which is important. Let me structure the final list as follows:

1. Dutton's Welcome to Country (merged)
2. Albanese's Adolescence funding
3. Candidates' defense
4. Ketamine nasal spray
5. Visa fee increase
6. Bondi stabbing
7. Gardiners Creek (Melbourne local)
8. Vietnamese memorial

Leaving out the visa refusal and African students? Wait, no, the African visa refusal is item11, which is separate. Wait the 8 items need to be selected. To have exactly 8, I need to decide. Maybe the visa refusal is more important than the candidates' defense. But the candidates' defense is part of election coverage which is big. Alternatively, include both but drop the Vietnamese memorial? No, the Vietnamese 50th anniversary might have higher significance for the community. Maybe the visa refusal and candidates' defense both count as big news. 

Alternatively, the user might prioritize the merged items first, then the biggest remaining. Let me list them in order of priority:

1. Dutton-Welcome to Country (merged)
2. Albanese's Adolescence and funding
3. Candidates defense (merged from item3)
4. Ketamine nasal spray (PBS addition is major)
5. Visa fees increase (760M funding)
6. Bondi stabbing inquest (crime)
7. Gardiners Creek (local)
8. Vietnamese memorial (cultural significance)
That's 8, excluding the visa refusal. But the visa refusal's story (item11) is about denying visas to students, leading to tour cancelation, which is a significant policy issue. Hmm, tough. Alternatively, the visa refusal is a headline, so maybe replace one of the others. Maybe the candidates' defense and visa refusal are both top. Let's see:

Possibly the correct 8 would include the visa refusal instead of the candidates' defense? Let me check the content again. The visa refusal denial's content: "A group of young African performers have been denied entry, causing a charity event cancellation." That's a big news item. The candidates' defense is about politicians defending past social media comments of their candidates, which is political but perhaps slightly less impactful. 

Alternatively, the user instruction says to merge duplicates (which we did) and then select the biggest 8. The visa refusal is a key issue, so let's include that, making it:

1. Dutton-Welcome to Country (merged)
2. Albanese's Adolescence etc.
3. Candidates' defense
4. Ketamine nasal spray
5. Visa fees increase
6. Bondi stabbing
7. African visa refusal
8. Gardiners Creek (local)

That way, excluding the Vietnamese memorial. But the Vietnamese is also significant. Hmm. Alternatively, perhaps the Vietnamese is a major cultural event. 

Alternatively, maybe the candidates' defense and visa refusal both make it in, displacing the Vietnamese. But the user wants Melbourne local and Australia news. The Vietnamese event is national, the visa refusal is national, Gardiners Creek is Melbourne. So perhaps the Vietnamese and visa refusal are both top. Let me try again:

1. Dutton-Welcome to Country (merged)
2. Albanese's Adolescence
3. Candidates' defense (merged)
4. Ketamine nasal spray
5. Visa fees increase
6. Bondi stabbing
7. Gardiners Creek (local)
8. African visa refusal

Leaving out the Vietnamese memorial? Or maybe the Vietnamese is more significant. Alternatively, the Vietnamese is a 50th anniversary of a major historical event, so it's important. Maybe the visa refusal has higher priority. Alternatively, perhaps the user wants to include both, but it's over 8. Let me check the count again.

Original list after merging duplicates:

- [merged Dutton-Welcome to Country] (items 2 and 13)
- Albanese's Adolescence (item1)
- Candidates' defense (item3)
- Ketamine (item4)
- Visa fees (item5)
- Bondi stabbing (item6)
- Gardiners Creek (item7)
- Vietnamese memorial (item10)
- African visa refusal (item11)

That's 8 items if we omit either the candidates' defense or the African visa refusal. Alternatively, the user might consider the visa refusal more impactful. The candidates' defense is about political candidates' past comments, which is a political scandal. That's definitely big news. So perhaps:

1. Dutton-Welcome to Country
2. Albanese's policies
3. Candidates' defense
4. Ketamine
5. Visa fees
6. Bondi
7. Gardiners Creek
8. Visa refusal

Leaving out Vietnamese. But the Vietnamese story is about 50 years since the Fall of Saigon, which is a major historical anniversary. Alternatively, maybe the user's examples include the Vietnamese one. Let me go with the top 8 based on impact:

Including the visa refusal and the candidates' defense. The Vietnamese can be excluded, but maybe it's a key story. Alternatively, the user might prioritize the visa refusal over the Vietnamese. Alternatively, perhaps the candidates' defense is more important. 

Alternatively, maybe the user's instruction says "merge duplications into one and put at first, then select the biggest 8. The top ones are:

1. Merged Dutton-Welcome to Country (since duplicated)
2. Albanese's Adolescence and funding (important federal policy)
3. Candidates' defense (political, big news)
4. Ketamine nasal spray (major health)
5. Visa fee increase (election funding, major)
6. Bondi stabbing (crime)
7. Gardiners Creek (local)
8. African visa refusal (immigration issue)

That's 8 items. The Vietnamese could be ninth. Since the user asked for exactly 8, we have to drop one. Since the Vietnamese is a community story but perhaps less pressing, maybe leave it out. Alternatively, maybe the African visa refusal is more urgent. 

Alternatively, the visa refusal and the candidates' defense are both top, so they stay, and Vietnamese is cut. 

Proceeding with that, the final list would have the 8 items as per above. Now, translating each into Chinese with the proper links and descriptions. Ensuring each entry is a concise description. Also, ensure that the merged items have combined the content. For example, the merged Dutton's statements combine the two articles about his opposition to Welcome to Country and his comments on it being overdone. The content for the merged entry would mention both his opposition and criticism of the ceremony's overuse. 

Also, check that each link is correctly assigned. The merged Dutton entry should link to both sources, but the user's instruction says each item must have the original link. Oh wait the user's instruction says to put the original link of each item. But when merging, which link to choose? The instruction says "if there are duplications which means the news is more important, please merge them into one and put at the first". So when merging, the merged item's link would need to be linked to one of them. Since the first of the duplicates is first. For example, the first occurrence's link? Or pick one. Since both are Dutton's statements, perhaps use the primary one. 

Similarly, the merged item’s title should combine their points. 

Now, write the entries in Chinese:

标题1: 彼得·达顿反对澳战争纪念仪式中的的原住民欢迎仪式，称“那不是那一天”（合并两个关于此话题的条目，链接选其中一个主要链接，比如第一个的链接）

标题2: 阿尔巴尼斯呼吁青少年观看电视剧《青少年》，并承诺2000万澳元反暴力资金

标题3: 大选前，自由党和工党领导人被迫为候选人争议性社交媒体言论辩护（合并item3的链接）

标题4: 鼻腔喷雾治疗难治性抑郁药物入选医保，政府30年首次新增药物

标题5: 工党计划增国际学生签证费，为7.6亿选举承诺筹资

标题6: 债券购物中心持刀伤人案听证会：凶手精神失常，非针对女性

标题7: 墨尔本Gardiners Creek保护区将建20层高楼引居民强烈反对（本地新闻）

标题8: 非洲留学生因签证拒签致文化巡演取消，引发争议（非洲学生签证事件）

这样总共8条。注意确保每个条目有正确的链接。例如，合并后的的条目链接可能选其中一个。比如关于Dutton的两个链接，选第一个的链接：

第一个Dutton的链接是 "https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/peter-dutton-welcome-to country..." 

然后, the visa refusal item's link is item11's link. 

The merged Dutton-Welcome to Country entry's content combines the two articles' content about his opposition during Anzac Day and calling it overdone. 

Now, the Vietnamese 50th anniversary might be dropped to stay at 8. Alternatively, perhaps the visa refusal is more impactful than the Vietnamese story, so include it instead of the Vietnamese one. 

So the final list is 8 items as above. Proceeding to structure them in markdown in Chinese with correct links and concise summaries.
</think>

# 大新闻  
- [彼得·达顿反对澳战争纪念仪式中的的原住民欢迎仪式，称“那不是那一天”](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/peter-dutton-welcome-to country...)  
反对派领导人彼得·达顿称“欢迎原住民仪式在阵亡将士纪念日‘不合适’”，引发对原住民传统仪式的争议。  

- [总理阿尔巴尼斯呼吁青少年观看电视剧《青少年》，并承诺2000万澳元反暴力资金](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/pm-praises-adolescence...)  
总理称澳大利亚对性别暴力的反应不足，并推荐校园暴力题材电视剧。  

- [大选前，自由党和工党领导人被迫为候选人争议性社交媒体言论辩护](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/dutton-albanese-forced-to-defend-candidates...)  
两党领袖为涉种族主义等争议性言论的候选人辩护，引发舆论对候选人资格的讨论。  

- [鼻腔喷雾治疗难治性抑郁药物入选医保，政府30年首次新增药物](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/ketamine-derived-nasal-spray...)  
新型抗抑郁药物被纳入医保，成为30年来首个获批的抗抑郁新药。  

- [工党计划增国际学生签证费，为7.6亿选举承诺筹资](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/labor-to fund...)  
工党拟通过提高国际学生签证费，为教育和住房政策筹集7.6亿澳元。  

- [债券购物中心持刀伤人案听证会：凶手精神失常，非针对女性](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/women-not-a-target...)  
警方向称悉尼商场持刀伤人案凶手精神疾病发作，非蓄意针对女性受害者。  

- [墨尔本Gardiners Creek保护区将建20层高楼引居民强烈反对](https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/...)  
维州政府计划在生态保护区旁建摩天楼，引发环保和社区阳光权争议。  

- [非洲留学生因签证拒签致文化巡演取消，引发争议](https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/african-student-performers...)  
澳拒签非洲学生表演者致慈善巡演取消，引发移民政策是否歧视的质疑。
