Restrict starred projects to viewable ones
`User#starred_projects` doesn't perform any visibility checks. This has
a couple of problems:
1. It assumes a user can always view all of their starred projects in
perpetuity (project not changed to private, access revoked, etc.).
2. It assumes that we'll only ever allow a user to star a project they
can view. This is currently the case, but bugs happen.
Add `User#viewable_starred_projects` to filter the starred projects by
those the user either has explicit access to, or are public or
internal. Then use that in all places where we list the user's starred
projects.
Closes#17249.
See merge request !4108
Only generate repository push email once
The repository push email can be very expensive to generate, especially
with syntax-highlighted diffs. Instead of generating the email for each
recipient, generate one email object and reset the Message-Id and To
headers for each recipient. (Cloning would also be expensive in the case
of large emails, although probably not as bad as generating from
scratch.)
Closes#17270.
See merge request !4070
Enable the StringReplacement cop.
Also fix one use of `gsub` that would be faster as `delete`.
Use `tr` instead of `gsub` when you are replacing the same number of characters. Use `delete` instead of `gsub` when you are deleting characters.
See merge request !3960
The repository push email can be very expensive to generate, especially
with syntax-highlighted diffs. Instead of generating the email for each
recipient, generate one email object and reset the Message-Id and To
headers for each recipient. (Cloning would also be expensive in the case
of large emails, although probably not as bad as generating from
scratch.)
Removes jquery-scrollto-rails.
Instead the script is now included directly from the vendor directory.
Resolves#17166. Working towards #14286 and merging !3775.
The gem was on 1.4.3.1, here's the diff between that tag and 2.1.2 (the version I'm using in this MR): https://github.com/flesler/jquery.scrollTo/compare/1.4.3...2.1.2
There aren't any notable breaking changes that I noticed, and I didn't see any JS errors after testing a bunch of pages.
cc: @jschatz1
See merge request !4088
Also fix one use of `gsub` that would be faster as `delete`.
Use `tr` instead of `gsub` when you are replacing the same number of
characters. Use `delete` instead of `gsub` when you are deleting
characters.
`User#starred_projects` doesn't perform any visibility checks. This has
a couple of problems:
1. It assumes a user can always view all of their starred projects in
perpetuity (project not changed to private, access revoked, etc.).
2. It assumes that we'll only ever allow a user to star a project they
can view. This is currently the case, but bugs happen.
Add `User#viewable_starred_projects` to filter the starred projects by
those the user either has explicit access to, or are public or
internal. Then use that in all places where we list the user's starred
projects.
Remove broken inline runner description edit form
This remove inline form for editing runnner's description.
It is broken because of missing partial / incorrect response and it also does not make much sense, since we have under 'Edit' button a form that makes it possible to edit more than just a description.
See merge request !4095
Support multi-line tag messages
_Originally opened at !2853 by @clns._
- - -
Tag messages in Git can include a short summary of what changes are included in a release and any other relevant information. So I think GitLab should support multi-line tag messages, both in the "New Tag" interface and when viewing the tag.
Also a non-technical user could use GitLab's interface to create releases, but at the moment this is impossible because he cannot enter a multi-line message. This would've been very handy, otherwise he would need to do it from the command line or other GUI program, which is not something a non-technical user has access to or knows how to do.
This merge request adds support for multi-line tag messages. Below are the impacted screens. Let me know if I should change anything.
This would close#3690 and #2460


See merge request !3833
- Fix naming of API::CommitStatuses
- Ensure we use require_dependency instead of require
- Ensure the namespace is right in lib/api/api.rb, otherwise, we
might require Grape::API::Helpers which defines the `#params` method.
This is to avoid requiring a file multiple times and getting an "Already
initialized constant" error.
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Revert "Merge branch 'wiki-fix' into 'master'"
This reverts commit 4cc85a58e8 (!4026), reversing
changes made to 90ae445ba9.
From https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4026#note_11719950:
> 1. On Ruby 2.1.x, the [`uri.path = ::File.join(project_wiki_base_path, uri.path)`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/lib/banzai/filter/wiki_link_filter.rb#L39) raises an `URI::InvalidComponentError: bad component(expected relative path component): http://bar.com/baz` error in `Banzai::Filter::WikiLinkFilter#rebuild_wiki_uri`, which is then rescued in [`Banzai::Filter::WikiLinkFilter#process_link_attr`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/lib/banzai/filter/wiki_link_filter.rb#L34), thus the link is not modified and the tests pass.
1. On Ruby 2.2.x, the same line doesn't raise an error anymore, thus tests are broken on Ruby 2.2 only. I didn't really understand yet why having absolute links in the wiki would break some tests vs having relative links as before, but I think the safest course to action is to revert this MR and to find another fix (probably just prepending `ProjectWiki#wiki_base_path` with the relative URL path component if we are in the case of a relative URL...
/cc @artem-sidorenko
Just a FYI note: no need to pick into `8-7-stable` since the original commit was not picked.
See merge request !4105
Remove the annotate gem and delete old annotations
In 8278b763d9 the default behaviour of annotation
has changes, which was causing a lot of noise in diffs. We decided in #17382
that it is better to get rid of the whole annotate gem, and instead let people
look at schema.rb for the columns in a table.
Fixes: #17382
/cc @yorickpeterse
See merge request !4099